Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26085978›Full record

ArticleJournal of racial and ethnic health disparities2015

Are We Missing the Mark? The Implementation of Community Based Participatory Education in Cancer Disparities Curriculum Development.

Cassandra Fritz, Keith Naylor, Yashika Watkins, Thomas Britt, Lisa Hinton, Gina Curry, Fornessa Randal, Helen Lam, Karen Kim

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Empathy and the Development of Affective Skills.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Cassandra FritzUniversity of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, MC 4076, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Keith NaylorChicago State University Department of Health Studies, Chicago, USA.
Yashika WatkinsChicago State University, Chicago, USA.
Thomas BrittUniversity of Chicago, Medicine Comprehensive Cancer Center, Office of Community Engagement and Cancer Disparities, Chicago, USA.
Lisa HintonDepartment of Health Studies and Health Information, Administration, Chicago State University, Chicago, USA.
Gina CurryDepartment of Health Studies, Chicago State University, Chicago, USA.
Fornessa RandalDepartment of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, USA.
Helen LamDepartment of Health Studies and Health Information, Administration, Chicago State University, Chicago, USA.
Karen KimPritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

Re-Engineering Translational Research at the University of ChicagoUL1TR000430 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI SOLWAY, JULIAN · 2012 to 2016
$20.2M
Chicago South Side Cancer Disparities Intiative (1 of 2)P20CA165582 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI KIM, KAREN E · 2012 to 2015
$862k
Chicago South Side Cancer Disparities Initiative ( 2 of 2)P20CA165587 · NCI · CHICAGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BRITT, THOMAS · 2012 to 2015
$812k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000430NCI NIH HHS P20 CA165582NCI NIH HHS P20-CA165582-01A1NCI NIH HHS P20 CA165587
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe Chicago south side, even more so than national populations, continues to be burdened with widening gaps of disparities in cancer outcomes. Therefore, Chicago community members were engaged in addressing the following content areas for a cancer disparities curriculum: (1) the south side Chicago community interest in participating in curriculum design, (2) how community members should be involved in designing cancer disparities curriculum, and (3) what community members believe the curriculum should address to positively impact their community.

methodsEighty-six community members from 19 different zip code areas of Chicago attended the deliberative session. A survey composed of three quantitative and three short-answer content questions was analyzed.

resultsThe majority of participants were from the south side of Chicago (62 %) and females (86 %). Most, 94 %, believed community members should be involved in cancer disparities curriculum development. Moreover, 56 % wanted to be involved in designing the curriculum, and 61 % reported an interest in taking a course in cancer disparities. Three categorical themes were derived from the qualitative questions: (1) community empowerment through disparities education-"a prescription for change," (2) student skill development in community engagement and advocacy training, and (3) community expression of shared experiences in cancer health disparities.

conclusionThe community provided valuable input for curricular content and has an interest in collaborating on cancer disparities curriculum design. Community participation must be galvanized to improve disparities curricular development and delivery to successfully address the challenges of eliminating disparities in health.

Indexed as

Health Status DisparitiesAdultAgedBlack or African AmericanChicagoCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchCurriculumEducation, MedicalEducation, Public Health ProfessionalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsUniversitiesUrban HealthAfrican American healthCancer disparitiesCommunity based participatory educationCurriculum developmentDeliberative methods and community membersHealth disparitiesMedical educationUrban health

Identifiers

PMID26085978
PMCPMC4467197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.