Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26085941›Full record

ArticleActa naturae

Cancer Invasion: Patterns and Mechanisms.

N V Krakhmal, M V Zavyalova, E V Denisov, S V Vtorushin, V M Perelmuter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta naturae. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 176 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
176citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

176 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. An insight into theFuture medicinal chemistry · 2025
    Review
  13. Long Non-Coding RNA LINC01123 Facilitates Cholangiocarcinoma Aggravation by Targeting miR-641.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

116 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

N V KrakhmalSiberian State Medical University, Moskovskiy Trakt, 2, 634050, Tomsk, Russia.
M V ZavyalovaSiberian State Medical University, Moskovskiy Trakt, 2, 634050, Tomsk, Russia ; Tomsk Cancer Research Institute, Kooperativny Pereulok, 5, 634050, Tomsk, Russia ; Tomsk State University, Prosp. Lenina, 36, 634050, Tomsk, Russia.
E V DenisovTomsk Cancer Research Institute, Kooperativny Pereulok, 5, 634050, Tomsk, Russia ; Tomsk State University, Prosp. Lenina, 36, 634050, Tomsk, Russia.
S V VtorushinSiberian State Medical University, Moskovskiy Trakt, 2, 634050, Tomsk, Russia ; Tomsk Cancer Research Institute, Kooperativny Pereulok, 5, 634050, Tomsk, Russia.
V M PerelmuterSiberian State Medical University, Moskovskiy Trakt, 2, 634050, Tomsk, Russia ; Tomsk Cancer Research Institute, Kooperativny Pereulok, 5, 634050, Tomsk, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer invasion and the ability of malignant tumor cells for directed migration and metastasis have remained a focus of research for many years. Numerous studies have confirmed the existence of two main patterns of cancer cell invasion: collective cell migration and individual cell migration, by which tumor cells overcome barriers of the extracellular matrix and spread into surrounding tissues. Each pattern of cell migration displays specific morphological features and the biochemical/molecular genetic mechanisms underlying cell migration. Two types of migrating tumor cells, mesenchymal (fibroblast-like) and amoeboid, are observed in each pattern of cancer cell invasion. This review describes the key differences between the variants of cancer cell migration, the role of epithelial-mesenchymal, collective-amoeboid, mesenchymal-amoeboid, and amoeboid- mesenchymal transitions, as well as the significance of different tumor factors and stromal molecules in tumor invasion. The data and facts collected are essential to the understanding of how the patterns of cancer cell invasion are related to cancer progression and therapy efficacy. Convincing evidence is provided that morphological manifestations of the invasion patterns are characterized by a variety of tissue (tumor) structures. The results of our own studies are presented to show the association of breast cancer progression with intratumoral morphological heterogeneity, which most likely reflects the types of cancer cell migration and results from different activities of cell adhesion molecules in tumor cells of distinct morphological structures.

Indexed as

cancercell migrationcollective cell migrationindividual cell migrationinvasion

Identifiers

PMID26085941
PMCPMC4463409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.