Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26085860›Full record

ArticleNuclear medicine and molecular imaging2015

Diagnostic Performance of (68)Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT, (18)F-FDG PET/CT and (131)I-MIBG Scintigraphy in Mapping Metastatic Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma.

Teik Hin Tan, Zanariah Hussein, Fathinul Fikri Ahmad Saad, Ibrahim Lutfi Shuaib

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Cancer predisposition syndromes: an imaging review.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Effectiveness ofAsia Oceania journal of nuclear medicine & biology · 2024
    Article
  7. Synchronous carotid body and anterior mediastinal paraganglioma revealed byQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Imaging of Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Asia Oceania journal of nuclear medicine & biology · 2020
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. A phase I clinical trial for [Scientific reports · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Teik Hin TanNuclear Medicine Department, National Cancer Institute, No 4, Jalan P7, Presint 7, 62550 Putrajaya, Malaysia.
Zanariah HusseinDepartment of Endocrine, Hospital Putrajaya, Presint 7, 62250 Putrajaya, Wilayah Persekutuan Malaysia.
Fathinul Fikri Ahmad SaadDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Serdang Hospital, Jalan Puchong, Serdang, 43000 Malaysia.
Ibrahim Lutfi ShuaibDepartment of Radiology, Advanced Medical and Dental Institute, University Sains Malaysia, Bertam, 13200 Kepala Batas, Pulau Pinang Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the diagnostic performance of (68)Ga-DOTATATE (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT), (18)F-FDG PET/CT and (131)I-MIBG scintigraphy in the mapping of metastatic pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma. MATERIALS AND

methodsSeventeen patients (male = 8, female = 9; age range, 13-68 years) with clinically proven or suspicious metastatic pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma were included in this prospective study. Twelve patients underwent all three modalities, whereas five patients underwent (68)Ga-DOTATATE and (131)I-MIBG without (18)F-FDG. A composite reference standard derived from anatomical and functional imaging findings, along with histopathological information, was used to validate the findings. Results were analysed on a per-patient and on per-lesion basis. Sensitivity and accuracy were assessed using McNemar's test.

resultsOn a per-patient basis, 14/17 patients were detected in (68)Ga-DOTATATE, 7/17 patients in (131)I-MIBG, and 10/12 patients in (18)F-FDG. The sensitivity and accuracy of (68)Ga-DOTATATE, (131)I-MIBG and (18)F-FDG were (93.3 %, 94.1 %), (46.7 %, 52.9 %) and (90.9 %, 91.7 %) respectively. On a per-lesion basis, an overall of 472 positive lesions were detected; of which 432/472 were identified by (68)Ga-DOTATATE, 74/472 by (131)I-MIBG, and 154/300 (patient, n = 12) by (18)F-FDG. The sensitivity and accuracy of (68)Ga-DOTATATE, (131)I-MIBG and (18)F-FDG were (91.5 %, 92.6 % p < 0.0001), (15.7 %, 26.0 % p < 0.0001) and (51.3 %, 57.8 % p < 0.0001) respectively. Discordant lesions were demonstrated on (68)Ga-DOTATATE, (131)I-MIBG and (18)F-FDG.

conclusionsGa-DOTATATE PET/CT shows high diagnostic accuracy than (131)I-MIBG scintigraphy and (18)F-FDG PET/ CT in mapping metastatic pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma.

Indexed as

131I-MIBG18F-FDG68Ga-DOTATATEParagangliomaPET/CTPheochromocytoma

Identifiers

PMID26085860
PMCPMC4463879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.