Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26085856›Full record

ArticleNuclear medicine and molecular imaging2015

Comparison of Therapeutic Efficacy and Clinical Parameters Between Recombinant Human Thyroid Stimulating Hormone and Thyroid Hormone Withdrawal in High-Dose Radioiodine Treatment with Differentiated Thyroid Cancer.

Sehun Choi, Chang Ju Na, Jeonghun Kim, Yeon-Hee Han, Hee-Kwon Kim, Hwan-Jeong Jeong, Myung-Hee Sohn, Seok Tae Lim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sehun ChoiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea.
Chang Ju NaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea.
Jeonghun KimDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea.
Yeon-Hee HanDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea.
Hee-Kwon KimDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea ; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine, Cyclotron Research Center, Molecular Imaging & Therapeutic Medicine Research Center, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Gungiro, Deokjin-gu, Jeonju, Jeonbuk 561-180 Republic of Korea.
Hwan-Jeong JeongDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea ; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine, Cyclotron Research Center, Molecular Imaging & Therapeutic Medicine Research Center, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Gungiro, Deokjin-gu, Jeonju, Jeonbuk 561-180 Republic of Korea.
Myung-Hee SohnDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea ; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine, Cyclotron Research Center, Molecular Imaging & Therapeutic Medicine Research Center, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Gungiro, Deokjin-gu, Jeonju, Jeonbuk 561-180 Republic of Korea.
Seok Tae LimDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea ; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine, Cyclotron Research Center, Molecular Imaging & Therapeutic Medicine Research Center, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Gungiro, Deokjin-gu, Jeonju, Jeonbuk 561-180 Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeHigh-dose radioiodine treatment (HD-RIT) after injection of recombinant human thyroid stimulating hormone (rh-TSH) has become widely used. This study compared the therapeutic efficacy of HD-RIT and clinical parameters between rh-TSH supplement and thyroid hormone withdrawal (THW) after total thyroidectomy in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 266 patients (47 male and 219 female; age, 49.0 ± 10.9 years) with differentiated thyroid cancer detected from September 2011 to September 2012. Patients comprised THW (217, 81.6 %) and rh-TSH (49, 18.4 %). Inclusion criteria were: first HD-RIT; any TN stage; absence of distant metastasis. To evaluate the complete ablation of the remnant thyroid tissue or metastasis, we reviewed stimulated serum thyroglobulin (sTg), I-123 whole-body scan (RxWBS) on T4 off-state, and thyroid ultrasonography (US) or [F-18]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (F-18 FDG PET/CT) 6-8 months after HD-RIT. We defined a complete ablation state when all three of the follow-up conditions were satisfied; <2.0 ng/ml of the sTg, I-123 RxWBS (-), and thyroid US or F-18 FDG PET/CT (-). If one of the three was positive, ablation was considered incomplete. We also compared various clinical biomarkers (body weight, body mass index, liver and kidney function) between THW and rh-TSH groups.

resultsThe rates of complete ablation were 73.7 % (160/217) for the THW group and 73.5 % (36/49) for the rh-TSH group. There was no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.970). The follow-up aspartate transaminase (p = 0.001) and alanine transaminase (p = 0.001) were significantly higher in the THW group. The renal function parameters of blood urea nitrogen (p = 0.001) and creatinine (p = 0.005) tended to increase in the THW group. The change of body weight was + Δ0.96 (±1.9) kg for the THW group and was decreased by -Δ1.39 (±1.5) kg for the rh-TSH group. The change of body mass index was 0.4 (±0.7) kg/m(2) in the THW group and was decreased by -0.6 (±0.6) kg/m(2) in the rh-TSH group.

conclusionsConsistent with previous studies, the rates of complete ablation between the THW and rh-TSH groups were not significantly different. The clinical parameters, as we mentioned above, were elevated for THW group but were irrelevant for the rh-TSH group. The findings favor HD-RIT after rh-TSH, especially for patients with chronic liver and kidney disease.

Indexed as

Complete ablation rateHigh-dose radioiodine therapyKidney functionLiver functionRecombinant human TSHThyroid cancerThyroid hormone withdrawal

Identifiers

PMID26085856
PMCPMC4463877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.