Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26085618›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2015

Clinical Performance of Aspergillus PCR for Testing Serum and Plasma: a Study by the European Aspergillus PCR Initiative.

P Lewis White, Rosemary A Barnes, Jan Springer, Lena Klingspor, Manuel Cuenca-Estrella, C Oliver Morton, Katrien Lagrou, Stéphane Bretagne, Willem J G Melchers, Carlo Mengoli and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 130 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Genetic Detection ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Current and Future Pathways inAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  17. Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Analytical Performance of the Commercial MucorGeniusJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 10 institutions in 9 countries.

P Lewis WhitePublic Health Wales Microbiology Cardiff, Cardiff, United Kingdom lewis.white@wales.nhs.uk.
Rosemary A BarnesCardiff University, UHW, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Jan SpringerUniversity of Würzburg Medical Center, Würzburg, Germany.
Lena KlingsporKarolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Manuel Cuenca-EstrellaSpanish National Centre for Microbiology, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
C Oliver MortonUniversity of Western Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Katrien LagrouNational Reference Centre for Mycosis, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Stéphane BretagneDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Paris Diderot University, Saint Louis Hospital-APHP, Paris, France.
Willem J G MelchersRadboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Carlo MengoliUniversity of Padua, Padua, Italy.
J Peter DonnellyRadboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Werner J HeinzUniversity of Würzburg Medical Center, Würzburg, Germany.
Juergen LoefflerUniversity of Würzburg Medical Center, Würzburg, Germany.
EAPCRI
University of Würzburg · DECardiff University · GBAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ESKarolinska University Hospital · SEKU Leuven · BERadboud University Medical Center · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity of Padua · ITWestern Sydney University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aspergillus PCR testing of serum provides technical simplicity but with potentially reduced sensitivity compared to whole-blood testing. With diseases for which screening to exclude disease represents an optimal strategy, sensitivity is paramount. The associated analytical study confirmed that DNA concentrations were greater in plasma than those in serum. The aim of the current investigation was to confirm analytical findings by comparing the performance of Aspergillus PCR testing of plasma and serum in the clinical setting. Standardized Aspergillus PCR was performed on plasma and serum samples concurrently obtained from hematology patients in a multicenter retrospective anonymous case-control study, with cases diagnosed according to European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) consensus definitions (19 proven/probable cases and 42 controls). Clinical performance and clinical utility (time to positivity) were calculated for both kinds of samples. The sensitivity and specificity for Aspergillus PCR when testing serum were 68.4% and 76.2%, respectively, and for plasma, they were 94.7% and 83.3%, respectively. Eighty-five percent of serum and plasma PCR results were concordant. On average, plasma PCR was positive 16.8 days before diagnosis and was the earliest indicator of infection in 13 cases, combined with other biomarkers in five cases. On average, serum PCR was positive 10.8 days before diagnosis and was the earliest indicator of infection in six cases, combined with other biomarkers in three cases. These results confirm the analytical finding that the sensitivity of Aspergillus PCR using plasma is superior to that using serum. PCR positivity occurs earlier when testing plasma and provides sufficient sensitivity for the screening of invasive aspergillosis while maintaining methodological simplicity.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAspergillosisAspergillusCase-Control StudiesDNA, FungalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesPlasmaPolymerase Chain ReactionRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificitySpecimen HandlingDNA, Fungal

Identifiers

PMID26085618
PMCPMC4540904
OpenAlexW2095635144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.