Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26085614›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2015

Analytical Comparison of In Vitro-Spiked Human Serum and Plasma for PCR-Based Detection of Aspergillus fumigatus DNA: a Study by the European Aspergillus PCR Initiative.

Juergen Loeffler, Carlo Mengoli, Jan Springer, Stéphane Bretagne, Manuel Cuenca-Estrella, Lena Klingspor, Katrien Lagrou, Willem J G Melchers, C Oliver Morton, Rosemary A Barnes and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Molecular Diagnosis of Yeast Infections.Current fungal infection reports · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Blood Aspergillus PCR: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. PCR Technology for Detection of Invasive Aspergillosis.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2016
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 9 institutions in 9 countries.

Juergen LoefflerWürzburg University, Würzburg, Germany loeffler_j@ukw.de.
Carlo MengoliUniversity of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Jan SpringerWürzburg University, Würzburg, Germany.
Stéphane BretagneParis Diderot University, Saint Louis Hospital-APHP, Paris, France.
Manuel Cuenca-EstrellaSpanish National Centre for Microbiology, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Lena KlingsporKarolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Katrien LagrouNational Reference Center for Mycosis, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium Department of Microbiology and Immunology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Willem J G MelchersRadboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
C Oliver MortonUniversity of Western Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Rosemary A BarnesCardiff University, UHW, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
J Peter DonnellyRadboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
P Lewis WhitePublic Health Wales Microbiology Cardiff, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
European Aspergillus PCR Initiative
Cardiff University · GBRadboud University Medical Center · NLUniversity of Würzburg · DEDélégation Paris 7 · FRInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ESKarolinska University Hospital · SEKU Leuven · BEUniversity of Padua · ITWestern Sydney University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of serum or plasma for Aspergillus PCR testing facilitates automated and standardized technology. Recommendations for serum testing are available, and while serum and plasma are regularly considered interchangeable for use in fungal diagnostics, differences in galactomannan enzyme immunoassay (GM-EIA) performance have been reported and are attributed to clot formation. Therefore, it is important to assess plasma PCR testing to determine if previous recommendations for serum are applicable and also to compare analytical performance with that of serum PCR. Molecular methods testing serum and plasma were compared through multicenter distribution of quality control panels, with additional studies to investigate the effect of clot formation and blood fractionation on DNA availability. Analytical sensitivity and time to positivity (TTP) were compared, and a regression analysis was performed to identify variables that enhanced plasma PCR performance. When testing plasma, sample volume, preextraction-to-postextraction volume ratio, PCR volume, duplicate testing, and the use of an internal control for PCR were positively associated with performance. When whole-blood samples were spiked and then fractionated, the analytical sensitivity and TTP were superior when testing plasma. Centrifugation had no effect on DNA availability, whereas the presence of clot material significantly lowered the concentration (P = 0.028). Technically, there are no major differences in the molecular processing of serum and plasma, but the formation of clot material potentially reduces available DNA in serum. During disease, Aspergillus DNA burdens in blood are often at the limits of PCR performance. Using plasma might improve performance while maintaining the methodological simplicity of serum testing.

Indexed as

AspergillosisAspergillus fumigatusDNA, FungalHumansModels, BiologicalMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesPlasmaPolymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificitySpecimen HandlingTime FactorsDNA, Fungal

Identifiers

PMID26085614
PMCPMC4540929
OpenAlexW1921725164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.