SynthesisClinical trials (London, England)2015
Systematic review of interventional sickle cell trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov.
Synthesis in Clinical trials (London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cardiac Toxicity in the Treatment of Light Chain Amyloidosis: Systematic Review of Clinical Studies.Current drug safety · 2024Pooled it
- Re-analysis of the current status of clinical trial registration in China.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Pooled it
- A systematic review of the processes used to link clinical trial registrations to their published results.Systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Experiences With a Multicomponent Digital Behavioral Pain Management Intervention for Adults With Sickle Cell Disease: Qualitative Analysis of the CaRISMA Trial.JMIR human factors · 2025Trial
- Using the consolidated framework for implementation research to identify recruitment barriers and targeted strategies for a shared decision-making randomized clinical trial in pediatric sickle cell disease.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2023Trial
- Motivators and Barriers Affecting Decisions to Participate in Clinical Trials for Sickle Cell Disease: United States Findings from the Quantitative LISTEN Survey.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026Article
- Recruitment and retention of young adults with sickle cell disease.Health care transitions · 2026Article
- Palatability and Acceptability of Flaxseed-Supplemented Foods in Children with Sickle Cell Disease.Nutrients · 2023Article
- Clinical trial considerations in sickle cell disease: patient-reported outcomes, data elements, and the stakeholder engagement framework.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2021Review
- Applicability and added value of novel methods to improve drug development in rare diseases.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2018Article
- Acute kidney injury during a pediatric sickle cell vaso-occlusive pain crisis.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2017Article
- Using re-randomization to increase the recruitment rate in clinical trials - an assessment of three clinical areas.Trials · 2016Article
- Trends in Research with U.S. Military Service Member Participants: A Population-Specific ClinicalTrials.gov Review.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2016Article
- Mistrust of Pediatric Sickle Cell Disease Clinical Trials Research.American journal of preventive medicine · 2016Article
- New insights into sickle cell disease: mechanisms and investigational therapies.Current opinion in hematology · 2016Review
- Hydroxyurea decreases hospitalizations in pediatric patients with Hb SC and Hb SB+ thalassemia.Journal of blood medicine · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimsThe registry ClinicalTrials.gov was created to provide investigators and patients an accessible database of relevant clinical trials.
methodsTo understand the state of sickle cell disease clinical trials, a comprehensive review of all 174 "closed," "interventional" sickle cell trials registered at ClinicalTrials.gov was completed in January 2015.
resultsThe majority of registered sickle cell disease clinical trials listed an academic center as the primary sponsor and were an early phase trial. The primary outcome for sickle cell disease trials focused on pain (23%), bone marrow transplant (BMT) (13%), hydroxyurea (8%), iron overload (8%), and pulmonary hypertension (8%). A total of 52 trials were listed as terminated or withdrawn, including 25 (14% of all trials) terminated for failure to enroll participants. At the time of this review, only 19 trials uploaded results and 29 trials uploaded a manuscript in the ClinicalTrials.gov database. A systematic review of pubmed.gov revealed that only 35% of sickle cell studies completed prior to 2014 resulted in an identified manuscript. In comparison, of 80 thalassemia trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, four acknowledged failure to enroll participants as a reason for trial termination or withdrawal, and 48 trials (60%) completed prior to 2014 resulted in a currently identified manuscript.
conclusionClinicalTrials.gov can be an important database for investigators and patients with sickle cell disease to understand the current available research trials. To enhance the validity of the website, investigators must update their trial results and upload trial manuscripts into the database. This study, for the first time, quantifies outcomes of sickle cell disease trials and provides support to the belief that barriers exist to successful completion, publication, and dissemination of sickle cell trial results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.