ArticleGenome biology and evolution2015
Estimating the Fitness Effects of New Mutations in the Wild Yeast Saccharomyces paradoxus.
Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genomic characterization and diversity of dsRNA viruses and their killer satellites in a natural population of the yeastVirus evolution · 2026Article
- Quantifying the fraction of new mutations that are recessive lethal.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2023Article
- Population Size, Sex and Purifying Selection: Comparative Genomics of Two Sister Taxa of the Wild Yeast Saccharomyces paradoxus.Genome biology and evolution · 2020Article
- Molecular Origins of Complex Heritability in Natural Genotype-to-Phenotype Relationships.Cell systems · 2019Article
- Inference of the Distribution of Selection Coefficients for New Nonsynonymous Mutations Using Large Samples.Genetics · 2017Article
- Strain-dependent mutational effects for Pepino mosaic virus in a natural host.BMC evolutionary biology · 2017Article
- Uniparental Inheritance Promotes Adaptive Evolution in Cytoplasmic Genomes.Molecular biology and evolution · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The nature of selection acting on a population is in large measure determined by the distribution of fitness effects of new mutations. In this study, we use DNA sequences from four closely related clades of Saccharomyces paradoxus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae to identify and polarize new mutations and estimate their fitness effects. By progressively restricting the analyses to narrower categories of sites, we further seek to characterize sites with predictable mutational effects, that is, unconditionally deleterious, neutral or beneficial. Consistent with previous studies on S. paradoxus, we have failed to find evidence for mutations with beneficial effects, even in regions that were divergent in two outgroup clades, perhaps a consequence of the relatively unchallenged, predominantly asexual and highly inbred lifestyle of this species. On the other hand, there is abundant evidence of deleterious mutations, varying in severity of effect from strongly deleterious to very mild, particularly in regions conserved in the outgroup taxa, indicating a history of persistent purifying selection. Narrowing the analysis down to individual amino acids reduces further the range of effects: for example, mutations changing cysteine are predicted to be nearly always strongly deleterious, whereas those changing arginine, serine, and tyrosine are expected to be nearly neutral. The proportion of mutations with deleterious effects for a particular amino acid is correlated with long-term stasis of that amino acid among highly divergent sequences from a variety of organisms, showing that functionality of sites tends to persist through the diversification of clades and that our findings are also relevant to longer evolutionary times and other taxa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.