ArticleGenome biology and evolution2015
The Contribution of Genetic Recombination to CRISPR Array Evolution.
Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genomic Exploration of CRISPR-Cas Systems in Raoultella species: Diversity and Architecture.Current microbiology · 2026Article
- New Insights into CRISPR-like Arrays inPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Evolutionary trends inmSystems · 2025Article
- SpacerPlacer: ancestral reconstruction of CRISPR arrays reveals the evolutionary dynamics of spacer deletions.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- CRISPR arrays as high-resolution markers to track microbial transmission during influenza infection.Microbiome · 2023Article
- Distribution and phasing of sequence motifs that facilitate CRISPR adaptation.Current biology : CB · 2021Article
- Shining light on a deep-sea bacterial symbiont population structure with CRISPR.Microbial genomics · 2021Article
- Genomic Insights into Drug Resistance and Virulence Platforms, CRISPR-Cas Systems and Phylogeny of CommensalMicroorganisms · 2021Article
- Article
- Article
- Atypical organizations and epistatic interactions of CRISPRs and cas clusters in genomes and their mobile genetic elements.Nucleic acids research · 2020Article
- Analysis of direct repeats and spacers of CRISPR/Cas systems type I-F in Brazilian clinical strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2019Review
- Domestication of previously uncultivated Candidatus Desulforudis audaxviator from a deep aquifer in Siberia sheds light on its physiology and evolution.The ISME journal · 2019Article
- CRISPRs for Strain Tracking and Their Application to Microbiota Transplantation Data Analysis.The CRISPR journal · 2019Article
- Molecular mechanisms of CRISPR-Cas spacer acquisition.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2019Review
- Selective Maintenance of Multiple CRISPR Arrays Across Prokaryotes.The CRISPR journal · 2018Article
- CRISPRCasFinder, an update of CRISRFinder, includes a portable version, enhanced performance and integrates search for Cas proteins.Nucleic acids research · 2018Article
- Phylogeographic separation and formation of sexually discrete lineages in a global population ofMicrobial genomics · 2017Article
- Dynamics of Escherichia coli type I-E CRISPR spacers over 42 000 years.Molecular ecology · 2017Article
- CRISPR Diversity and Microevolution in Clostridium difficile.Genome biology and evolution · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats) is a microbial immune system against foreign DNA. Recognition sequences (spacers) encoded within the CRISPR array mediate the immune reaction in a sequence-specific manner. The known mechanisms for the evolution of CRISPR arrays include spacer acquisition from foreign DNA elements at the time of invasion and array erosion through spacer deletion. Here, we consider the contribution of genetic recombination between homologous CRISPR arrays to the evolution of spacer repertoire. Acquisition of spacers from exogenic arrays via recombination may confer the recipient with immunity against unencountered antagonists. For this purpose, we develop a novel method for the detection of recombination in CRISPR arrays by modeling the spacer order in arrays from multiple strains from the same species. Because the evolutionary signal of spacer recombination may be similar to that of pervasive spacer deletions or independent spacer acquisition, our method entails a robustness analysis of the recombination inference by a statistical comparison to resampled and perturbed data sets. We analyze CRISPR data sets from four bacterial species: two Gammaproteobacteria species harboring CRISPR type I and two Streptococcus species harboring CRISPR type II loci. We find that CRISPR array evolution in Escherichia coli and Streptococcus agalactiae can be explained solely by vertical inheritance and differential spacer deletion. In Pseudomonas aeruginosa, we find an excess of single spacers potentially incorporated into the CRISPR locus during independent acquisition events. In Streptococcus thermophilus, evidence for spacer acquisition by recombination is present in 5 out of 70 strains. Genetic recombination has been proposed to accelerate adaptation by combining beneficial mutations that arose in independent lineages. However, for most species under study, we find that CRISPR evolution is shaped mainly by spacer acquisition and loss rather than recombination. Since the evolution of spacer content is characterized by a rapid turnover, it is likely that recombination is not beneficial for improving phage resistance in the strains under study, or that it cannot be detected in the resolution of intraspecies comparisons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.