Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26085375›Full record

ReviewProtoplasma2016

NPKS uptake, sensing, and signaling and miRNAs in plant nutrient stress.

Manoj Nath, Narendra Tuteja

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Protoplasma, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Transcriptome Sequencing ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Phylogeny and Expression Atlas of thePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. The Evolution and Functional Roles ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. miRNAomic Approach to Plant Nitrogen Starvation.International journal of genomics · 2021
    Review
  14. Roles of Non-Coding RNAs in Response to Nitrogen Availability in Plants.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Potential Root Foraging Strategy of Wheat (Frontiers in plant science · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Manoj NathPlant Molecular Biology Group, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, 110067, New Delhi, India.
Narendra TutejaPlant Molecular Biology Group, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, 110067, New Delhi, India. narendra@icgeb.res.in.
International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology · ITInternational Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sessile nature of higher plants consequently makes it highly adaptable for nutrient absorption and acquisition from soil. Plants require 17 essential elements for their growth and development which include 14 minerals (macronutrients: N, P, K, Mg, Ca, S; micronutrients: Cl, Fe, B, Mn, Zn, Cu, Ni, Mo) and 3 non-mineral (C, H, O) elements. The roots of higher plants must acquire these macronutrients and micronutrients from rhizosphere and further allocate to other plant parts for completing their life cycle. Plants evolved an intricate series of signaling and sensing cascades to maintain nutrient homeostasis and to cope with nutrient stress/availability. The specific receptors for nutrients in root, root system architecture, and internal signaling pathways help to develop plasticity in response to the nutrient starvation. Nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), potassium (K), and sulfur (S) are essential for various metabolic processes, and their deficiency negatively effects the plant growth and yield. Genes coding for transporters and receptors for nutrients as well as some small non-coding RNAs have been implicated in nutrient uptake and signaling. This review summarizes the N, P, K, and S uptake, sensing and signaling events in nutrient stress condition especially in model plant Arabidopsis thaliana and involvement of microRNAs in nutrient deficiency. This article also provides a framework of uptake, sensing, signaling and to highlight the microRNA as an emerging major players in nutrient stress condition. Nutrient-plant-miRNA cross talk may help plant to cope up nutrient stress, and understanding their precise mechanism(s) will be necessary to develop high yielding smart crop with low nutrient input.

Indexed as

CytokininsEnergy MetabolismIndoleacetic AcidsMicroRNAsNitrogenPhosphorusPlantsPotassiumSignal TransductionStress, PhysiologicalSulfurCytokininsIndoleacetic AcidsMicroRNAsNitrogenPhosphorusPotassiumSulfurNPKS uptakeNutrient-miRNA cross talkStress

Identifiers

PMID26085375
OpenAlexW641761962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.