Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26085328›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2015

Watchful waiting for subthreshold depression and anxiety in visually impaired older adults.

Hilde P A van der Aa, Esther Krijnen-de Bruin, Ger H M B van Rens, Jos W R Twisk, Ruth M A van Nispen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hilde P A van der AaDepartment of Ophthalmology, VU University Medical Centre, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. h.vanderaa@vumc.nl.
Esther Krijnen-de BruinDepartment of Ophthalmology, VU University Medical Centre, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. e.debruin1@vumc.nl.
Ger H M B van RensDepartment of Ophthalmology, VU University Medical Centre, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. rens@vumc.nl.
Jos W R TwiskDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Centre, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. jwr.twisk@vumc.nl.
Ruth M A van NispenDepartment of Ophthalmology, VU University Medical Centre, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. r.vannispen@vumc.nl.
Amsterdam Public Health · NLAmsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLElkerliek Ziekenhuis · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeImmediate treatment of depression and anxiety may not always be necessary in resilient patients. This study aimed to determine remission rates of subthreshold depression and anxiety, incidence rates of major depressive and anxiety disorders, and predictors of these remission and incidence rates in visually impaired older adults after a three-month 'watchful waiting' period.

methodsA pretest-posttest study in 265 visually impaired older adults (mean age 74 years), from outpatient low-vision rehabilitation services, with subthreshold depression and/or anxiety was performed as part of a randomised controlled trial on the cost-effectiveness of a stepped-care intervention. An ordinal logistic regression analysis was conducted. Main outcome measures were: (1) subthreshold depression and anxiety measured with the Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) and the anxiety subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A), and (2) depressive and anxiety disorders measured with the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview.

resultsAfter a three-month watchful waiting period, depression and anxiety decreased significantly by 3.8 (CES-D) and 1.4 points (HADS-A) (p < 0.001). Of all participants, 34 % recovered from subthreshold depression and/or anxiety and 18 % developed a depressive and/or anxiety disorder. Female gender [odds ratio (OR) 0.49, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.28-0.86], more problems with adjustment to vision loss at baseline (OR 1.02, 95 % CI 1.00-1.03), more symptoms of depression and anxiety at baseline (OR 1.06, 95 % CI 1.02-1.10), and a history of major depressive, dysthymic, and/or panic disorder (OR 2.28, 95 % CI 1.28-4.07) were associated with lower odds of remitting from subthreshold depression and/or anxiety and higher odds of developing a disorder after watchful waiting.

conclusionsWatchful waiting can be an appropriate step in managing depression and anxiety in visually impaired older adults. However, female gender, problems with adjustment to vision loss, higher depression and anxiety symptoms, and a history of a depressive or anxiety disorder confer a disadvantage. Screening tools may be used to identify patients with these characteristics, who may benefit more from higher intensity treatment or a shorter period of watchful waiting.

Indexed as

Watchful WaitingAgedAged, 80 and overAnxietyAnxiety DisordersCost-Benefit AnalysisDepressionFemaleHumansMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CareQuality of LifeVision DisordersAnxietyDepressionLow visionWatchful waiting

Identifiers

PMID26085328
PMCPMC4615663
OpenAlexW604530816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.