Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26085165›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2015

Genomic and Proteomic Analyses Indicate that Banchine and Campoplegine Polydnaviruses Have Similar, if Not Identical, Viral Ancestors.

Catherine Béliveau, Alejandro Cohen, Don Stewart, Georges Periquet, Abdelmadjid Djoumad, Lisa Kuhn, Don Stoltz, Brian Boyle, Anne-Nathalie Volkoff, Elisabeth A Herniou and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Insects · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Catherine BéliveauNatural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Laurentian Forestry Centre, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
Alejandro CohenProteomics Core Facility, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Don StewartNatural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Laurentian Forestry Centre, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
Georges PeriquetInstitut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l'Insecte, Université François-Rabelais et CNRS UMR 7261, Tours, France.
Abdelmadjid DjoumadNatural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Laurentian Forestry Centre, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
Lisa KuhnDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Don StoltzDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Brian BoyleInstitut de Biologie Intégrative et des Systèmes, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
Anne-Nathalie VolkoffUMR 1333 INRA, Université Montpellier, Diversité, Génomes, Interactions Microorganismes-Insectes, Montpellier, France.
Elisabeth A HerniouInstitut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l'Insecte, Université François-Rabelais et CNRS UMR 7261, Tours, France.
Jean-Michel DrezenInstitut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l'Insecte, Université François-Rabelais et CNRS UMR 7261, Tours, France.
Michel CussonNatural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Laurentian Forestry Centre, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada Département de Biochimie, de Microbiologie et de Bio-informatique, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada michel.cusson@nrcan-rncan.gc.ca.
Dalhousie University · CANatural Resources Canada · CACentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRCanadian Forest Service · CADiversité, génomes et interactions micro-organismes-insectes · FRUniversité de Tours · FRUniversité Laval · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledPolydnaviruses form a group of unconventional double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) viruses transmitted by endoparasitic wasps during egg laying into caterpillar hosts, where viral gene expression is essential to immature wasp survival. A copy of the viral genome is present in wasp chromosomes, thus ensuring vertical transmission. Polydnaviruses comprise two taxa, Bracovirus and Ichnovirus, shown to have distinct viral ancestors whose genomes were "captured" by ancestral wasps. While evidence indicates that bracoviruses derive from a nudivirus ancestor, the identity of the ichnovirus progenitor remains unknown. In addition, ichnoviruses are found in two ichneumonid wasp subfamilies, Campopleginae and Banchinae, where they constitute morphologically and genomically different virus types. To address the question of whether these two ichnovirus subgroups have distinct ancestors, we used genomic, proteomic, and transcriptomic analyses to characterize particle proteins of the banchine Glypta fumiferanae ichnovirus and the genes encoding them. Several proteins were found to be homologous to those identified earlier for campoplegine ichnoviruses while the corresponding genes were located in clusters of the wasp genome similar to those observed previously in a campoplegine wasp. However, for the first time in a polydnavirus system, these clusters also revealed sequences encoding enzymes presumed to form the replicative machinery of the progenitor virus and observed to be overexpressed in the virogenic tissue. Homology searches pointed to nucleocytoplasmic large DNA viruses as the likely source of these genes. These data, along with an analysis of the chromosomal form of five viral genome segments, provide clear evidence for the relatedness of the banchine and campoplegine ichnovirus ancestors. IMPORTANCE: Recent work indicates that the two recognized polydnavirus taxa, Bracovirus and Ichnovirus, are derived from distinct viruses whose genomes integrated into the genomes of ancestral wasps. However, the identity of the ichnovirus ancestor is unknown, and questions remain regarding the possibility that the two described ichnovirus subgroups, banchine and campoplegine ichnoviruses, have distinct origins. Our study provides unequivocal evidence that these two ichnovirus types are derived from related viral progenitors. This suggests that morphological and genomic differences observed between the ichnovirus lineages, including features unique to banchine ichnovirus genome segments, result from evolutionary divergence either before or after their endogenization. Strikingly, analysis of selected wasp genomic regions revealed genes presumed to be part of the replicative machinery of the progenitor virus, shedding new light on the likely identity of this virus. Finally, these genes could well play a role in ichnovirus replication as they were overexpressed in the virogenic tissue.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAnimalsBase SequenceBiological EvolutionDNA, ViralGene Expression ProfilingGenome, ViralGenomicsMolecular Sequence DataPolydnaviridaeSequence Analysis, DNAViral ProteinsWaspsDNA, ViralViral Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26085165
PMCPMC4524098
OpenAlexW2155874382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.