Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26085123›Full record

ArticleTobacco control2016

When a ban really is not a ban: internet loopholes and Djarum flavoured cigarettes in the USA.

Jon-Patrick Allem, John W Ayers, Benjamin M Althouse, Rebecca Williams

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco control, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Monitoring Tobacco Brand Websites to Understand Marketing Strategies Aimed at Tobacco Product Users and Potential Users.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Waterpipe Promotion and Use on Instagram: #Hookah.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2017
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jon-Patrick AllemKeck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
John W AyersGraduate School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, California, USA.
Benjamin M AlthouseThe Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA.
Rebecca WilliamsLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Centre, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

USC Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science (TCORS) for Vulnerable PopulationsP50CA180905 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI PENTZ, MARY ANN, SAMET, JONATHAN M · 2013 to 2017
$20.1M
Training grant for Cancer Control and EpidemiologyT32CA009492 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI PENTZ, MARY ANN · 1985 to 2019
$7.4M
Evaluating the Impact of Federal Legislation on Internet Tobacco SalesR01CA169189 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI WILLIAMS, REBECCA S · 2012 to 2021
$5.6M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA180905NCI NIH HHS R01 CA169189NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009492
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Flavoring AgentsHumansInternetSmokingTobacco IndustryTobacco ProductsUnited StatesFlavoring AgentsIllegal tobacco productsPublic policySurveillance and monitoringTobacco industry

Identifiers

PMID26085123
PMCPMC5087594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.