Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26084975›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2016

Factors Influencing Hospital Admission of Non-critically Ill Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department: a Cross-sectional Study.

Ashley E Lewis Hunter, Erica S Spatz, Steven L Bernstein, Marjorie S Rosenthal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Context factors in clinical decision-making: a scoping review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025
    Article
  8. Observational
  9. Airway, breathing, cellphone: a new vital sign?International journal of emergency medicine · 2024
    Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Is the Emergency Department an Inappropriate Venue for Code Status Discussions?The American journal of hospice & palliative care · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ashley E Lewis HunterDepartment of Medicine and Pediatrics, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. alewishunter@mednet.ucla.edu.
Erica S SpatzDepartment of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Steven L BernsteinDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Marjorie S RosenthalDepartment of Pediatrics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLittle is known about the factors that influence physicians' admission decisions, especially among lower acuity patients. For the purpose of our study, non-medical refers to all of the factors-other than the patient's clinical condition-that could potentially influence admission decisions.

objectiveTo describe the influence of non-medical factors on physicians' decisions to admit non-critically ill patients presenting to the ED.

designCross-sectional study of hospital admissions at a single academic medical center.

participantsNon-critically ill adult patients admitted to the hospital (n = 297) and the admitting emergency medicine physicians (n = 34). MAIN MEASURES: A patient survey assessed non-medical factors, including primary care access and utilization. A physician survey assessed clinical and non-medical factors influencing the decision to admit. Based on physician responses, admissions were characterized as "strongly acuity-driven," "moderately acuity-driven," or "weakly acuity-driven." Among these admission types, we compared length of stay, cost, and readmission within 30 days to the hospital or ED. KEY

resultsBased on the admitting physician's assessment, we categorized the motivation for admission as strongly acuity-driven in 185 (62 %) admissions, moderately acuity-driven in 92 (31 %), and weakly acuity-driven in 20 (7 %). Per the physician surveys, 51 % of hospitalizations were strongly or moderately influenced by one or more non-medical factors, including lack of information about baseline conditions (23 %); inadequate access to outpatient specialty care (14 %); need for a diagnostic testing or procedure (12 %); a recent ED visit (11 %); and inadequate access to primary care (10 %). Compared with strongly-acuity driven admissions, admissions that were moderately or weakly acuity-driven were shorter and less costly but were associated with similar rates of ED (35 %) and hospital (27 %) readmission.

conclusionsNon-medical factors are influential in the admission decisions for many patients presenting to the emergency department. Moderately and weakly acuity-driven admissions may represent a feasible target for alternative care pathways.

Indexed as

Surveys and QuestionnairesAcademic Medical CentersAcute DiseaseCritical IllnessCross-Sectional StudiesEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPatient AdmissionTime FactorsUnited Statesaccess to carecare transitionsdecision makingemergency medicinehealth care deliveryhospital admission decisionmedical decision makingnon-medical factorsseverity of illnesssocioeconomic factorsutilization

Identifiers

PMID26084975
PMCPMC4700015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.