Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26084810›Full record

ArticleThe FEBS journal2015

Uncovering major genomic features of essential genes in Bacteria and a methanogenic Archaea.

Ana Laura Grazziotin, Newton Medeiros Vidal, Thiago Motta Venancio

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The FEBS journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. iScience · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Identification of essential genes inMicrobial genomics · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Research on the Computational Prediction of Essential Genes.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Large-Scale Analysis of theFrontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ana Laura Grazziotin *Laboratório de Química e Função de Proteínas e Peptídeos, Centro de Biociências e Biotecnologia, Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro, Campos dos Goytacazes, RJ, Brazil.
Newton Medeiros Vidal *Laboratório de Química e Função de Proteínas e Peptídeos, Centro de Biociências e Biotecnologia, Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro, Campos dos Goytacazes, RJ, Brazil.
Thiago Motta VenancioLaboratório de Química e Função de Proteínas e Peptídeos, Centro de Biociências e Biotecnologia, Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro, Campos dos Goytacazes, RJ, Brazil.
State University of Norte Fluminense · BRNational Center for Biotechnology Information · US

Funding

Evolutionary Analysis and Comparative Genomics of Protein SuperfamiliesZIALM594244 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI ARAVIND, L · 2009 to 2025
$20.3M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA LM594244
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identification of essential genes is critical to understanding the physiology of a species, proposing novel drug targets and uncovering minimal gene sets required for life. Although essential gene sets of several organisms have been determined using large-scale mutagenesis techniques, systematic studies addressing their conservation, genomic context and functions remain scant. Here we integrate 17 essential gene sets from genome-wide in vitro screenings and three gene collections required for growth in vivo, encompassing 15 Bacteria and one Archaea. We refine and generalize important theories proposed using Escherichia coli. Essential genes are typically monogenic and more conserved than nonessential genes. Genes required in vivo are less conserved than those essential in vitro, suggesting that more divergent strategies are deployed when the organism is stressed by the host immune system and unstable nutrient availability. We identified essential analogous pathways that would probably be missed by orthology-based essentiality prediction strategies. For example, Streptococcus sanguinis carries horizontally transferred isoprenoid biosynthesis genes that are widespread in Archaea. Genes specifically essential in Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Burkholderia pseudomallei are reported as potential drug targets. Moreover, essential genes are not only preferentially located in operons, but also occupy the first position therein, supporting the influence of their regulatory regions in driving transcription of whole operons. Finally, these important genomic features are shared between Bacteria and at least one Archaea, suggesting that high order properties of gene essentiality and genome architecture were probably present in the last universal common ancestor or evolved independently in the prokaryotic domains.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, ArchaealGene Expression Regulation, BacterialGenes, EssentialGenome, ArchaealGenome, BacterialArchaeaBiological EvolutionBurkholderia pseudomalleiEscherichia coliGene Regulatory NetworksMolecular Sequence AnnotationMycobacterium tuberculosisStreptococcusessential genesgenome evolutiongenome organizationoperonsprokaryotestransposon mutagenesis

Identifiers

PMID26084810
PMCPMC4558319
OpenAlexW1600790493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.