Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26084701›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2015

A comprehensive grid to evaluate case management's expected effectiveness for community-dwelling frail older people: results from a multiple, embedded case study.

Thérèse Van Durme, Olivier Schmitz, Sophie Cès, Sibyl Anthierens, Patrick Maggi, Sam Delye, Johanna De Almeida Mello, Anja Declercq, Jean Macq, Roy Remmen and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Thérèse Van DurmeIRSS, Institute of Health and Society, Université catholique de Louvain clos Chapelle-aux-Champs, 30.13 B-1200, Brussels, Belgium. therese.vandurme@uclouvain.be.
Olivier SchmitzIRSS, Institute of Health and Society, Université catholique de Louvain clos Chapelle-aux-Champs, 30.13 B-1200, Brussels, Belgium. olivier.schmitz@uclouvain.be.
Sophie CèsIRSS, Institute of Health and Society, Université catholique de Louvain clos Chapelle-aux-Champs, 30.13 B-1200, Brussels, Belgium. sophie.ces@uclouvain.be.
Sibyl AnthierensFaculty of Medicine and Health Care Sciences, Universiteit Antwerpen Universiteitsplein, 1 B-2610, Wilrijk, Belgium. sibyl.anthierens@uantwerpen.be.
Patrick MaggiFaculty of Public Health Université de Liège Avenue de l'hôpital, 3 B-4000, Liège, Belgium. patrick.maggi@ulg.ac.be.
Sam DelyeFaculty of Public Health Université de Liège Avenue de l'hôpital, 3 B-4000, Liège, Belgium. sdelye@ulg.ac.be.
Johanna De Almeida MelloLUCAS, Centre for Care Research and Consultancy KU Leuven (University of Leuven), Kapucijnenvoer 39, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium. johanna.mello@med.kuleuven.be.
Anja DeclercqLUCAS, Centre for Care Research and Consultancy KU Leuven (University of Leuven), Kapucijnenvoer 39, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium. anja.declercq@med.kuleuven.be.
Jean MacqIRSS, Institute of Health and Society, Université catholique de Louvain clos Chapelle-aux-Champs, 30.13 B-1200, Brussels, Belgium. jean.macq@uclouvain.be.
Roy RemmenFaculty of Medicine and Health Care Sciences, Universiteit Antwerpen Universiteitsplein, 1 B-2610, Wilrijk, Belgium. roy.remmen@uantwerpen.be.
Isabelle AujoulatIRSS, Institute of Health and Society, Université catholique de Louvain clos Chapelle-aux-Champs, 30.13 B-1200, Brussels, Belgium. isabelle.aujoulat@uclouvain.be.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCase management is a type of intervention expected to improve the quality of care and therefore the quality of life of frail, community-dwelling older people while delaying institutionalisation in nursing homes. However, the heterogeneity, multidimensionality and complexity of these interventions make their evaluation by the means of classical approaches inadequate. Our objective was twofold: (i) to propose a tool allowing for the identification of the key components that explain the success of case management for this population and (ii) to propose a typology based on the results of this tool.

methodsThe process started with a multiple embedded case study design in order to identify the key components of case management. Based on the results of this first step, data were collected among 22 case management interventions, in order to evaluate their expected effectiveness. Finally, multiple correspondence analyses was conducted to propose a typology of case management. The overall approach was informed by Wagner's Chronic Care Model and the theory of complexity.

resultsThe study identified a total of 23 interacting key components. Based on the clustering of response patterns of the 22 case management projects included in our study, three types of case management programmes were evidenced, situated on a continuum from a more "socially-oriented" type towards a more "clinically-oriented" type of case management. The type of feedback provided to the general practitioner about both the global geriatric assessment and the result of the intervention turned out to be the most discriminant component between the types.

conclusionThe study design allowed to produce a tool that can be used to distinguish between different types of case management interventions and further evaluate their effect on frail older people in terms of the delaying institutionalisation, functional and cognitive status, quality of life and societal costs.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCase ManagementFrail ElderlyGeriatric AssessmentHumansIndependent LivingOrganizational Case StudiesQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID26084701
PMCPMC4472179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.