Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26084581›Full record

ReviewCurrent diabetes reports2015

Practical strategies to enhance executive functioning and strengthen diabetes management across the lifespan.

Rachel M Wasserman, Marisa E Hilliard, David D Schwartz, Barbara J Anderson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current diabetes reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Stressful Life Events in Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes in the U.S. T1D Exchange Clinic Registry.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rachel M WassermanDepartment of Pediatrics, Section of Psychology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA, rmwasser@texaschildrens.org.
Marisa E Hilliard
David D Schwartz
Barbara J Anderson

Funding

Mentoring Behavioral Scientists for Career Development in Pediatric T1D ResearchK12DK097696 · NIDDK · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI ANDERSON, BARBARA JANE · 2012 to 2016
$1.8M
NIDDK NIH HHS 1K12 DK097696NIDDK NIH HHS K12 DK097696
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The complex type 1 diabetes (T1D) management regimen places extra demands on one's ability to plan, organize, and problem-solve, a set of skills described as executive functioning (EF). Research on the relation between EF and T1D management has been mounting and suggest that deficits in EF skills likely interfere with optimal management. However, given the substantial EF demands of T1D management, any person with T1D, including those without clinically significant deficits, could likely benefit from strategies to improve diabetes-related EF skills. The current review outlines typical EF development across the lifespan and suggests behavioral strategies (e.g., environmental modifications) from the EF literature and clinical experience to enhance EF skills at each period of development. When executive dysfunction is suspected, formal neuropsychological assessment is recommended as EF concerns can be a significant problem of their own, or they could be an indicator of another psychological disorder, such as depression or dementia.

Indexed as

Age DistributionCognition DisordersDepressionDiabetes MellitusExecutive FunctionHumansNeuropsychological Tests

Identifiers

PMID26084581
PMCPMC4500176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.