ArticleNMR in biomedicine2015
Reproducibility and optimization of in vivo human diffusion-weighted MRS of the corpus callosum at 3 T and 7 T.
Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Single-shot diffusion trace spectroscopic imaging using radial echo planar trajectories.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2024Article
- The future is 2D: spectral-temporal fitting of dynamic MRS data provides exponential gains in precision over conventional approaches.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2023Article
- Multiparametric characterization of white matter alterations in early stage Huntington disease.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- In vivo diffusion-weighted MRS using semi-LASER in the human brain at 3 T: Methodological aspects and clinical feasibility.NMR in biomedicine · 2021Article
- What is the optimal schedule for multiparametric MRS? A magnetic resonance fingerprinting perspective.NMR in biomedicine · 2021Article
- Cytosolic diffusivity and microscopic anisotropy of N-acetyl aspartate in human white matter with diffusion-weighted MRS at 7 T.NMR in biomedicine · 2021Article
- Quantifying the Metabolic Signature of Multiple Sclerosis byFrontiers in neurology · 2019Review
- Robust diffusion tensor imaging by spatiotemporal encoding: Principles and in vivo demonstrations.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2017Article
- Longitudinal MR spectroscopy of neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis with diffusion of the intra-axonal constituentNeuroImage. Clinical · 2017Article
- Glial and axonal changes in systemic lupus erythematosus measured with diffusion of intracellular metabolites.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Diffusion-weighted MRS (DWS) of brain metabolites enables the study of cell-specific alterations in tissue microstructure by probing the diffusion of intracellular metabolites. In particular, the diffusion properties of neuronal N-acetylaspartate (NAA), typically co-measured with N-acetylaspartyl glutamate (NAAG) (NAA + NAAG = tNAA), have been shown to be sensitive to intraneuronal/axonal damage in pathologies such as stroke and multiple sclerosis. Lacking, so far, are empirical assessments of the reproducibility of DWS measures across time and subjects, as well as a systematic investigation of the optimal acquisition parameters for DWS experiments, both of which are sorely needed for clinical applications of the method. In this study, we acquired comprehensive single-volume DWS datasets of the human corpus callosum at 3 T and 7 T. We investigated the inter- and intra-subject variability of empirical and modeled diffusion properties of tNAA [D(avg) (tNAA) and D(model) (tNAA), respectively]. Subsequently, we used a jackknife-like resampling approach to explore the variance of these properties in partial data subsets reflecting different total scan durations. The coefficients of variation (C(V)) and repeatability coefficients (C(R)) for D(avg) (tNAA) and D(model) (tNAA) were calculated for both 3 T and 7 T, with overall lower variability in the 7 T results. Although this work is limited to the estimation of the diffusion properties in the corpus callosum, we show that a careful choice of diffusion-weighting conditions at both field strengths allows the accurate measurement of tNAA diffusion properties in clinically relevant experimental time. Based on the resampling results, we suggest optimized acquisition schemes of 13-min duration at 3T and 10-min duration at 7 T, whilst retaining low variability (C(V) ≈ 8%) for the tNAA diffusion measures. Power calculations for the estimation of D(model )(tNAA) and D(avg) (tNAA) based on the suggested schemes show that less than 21 subjects per group are sufficient for the detection of a 10% effect between two groups in case-control studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.