Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26084563›Full record

ArticleNMR in biomedicine2015

Reproducibility and optimization of in vivo human diffusion-weighted MRS of the corpus callosum at 3 T and 7 T.

Emily T Wood, Ayse Ece Ercan, Francesca Branzoli, Andrew Webb, Pascal Sati, Daniel S Reich, Itamar Ronen

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Emily T Wood *Translational Neuroradiology Unit (NINDS), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Ayse Ece Ercan *C. J. Gorter Center for High Field MRI, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Francesca BranzoliInstitut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière - ICM, Centre for NeuroImaging Research - CENIR, Paris, France.
Andrew WebbC. J. Gorter Center for High Field MRI, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Pascal SatiTranslational Neuroradiology Unit (NINDS), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Daniel S ReichTranslational Neuroradiology Unit (NINDS), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Itamar RonenC. J. Gorter Center for High Field MRI, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Leiden University Medical Center · NLNational Institutes of Health · USInstitut du Cerveau · FR

Funding

Multimodal MRI in Multiple SclerosisZIANS003119 · NINDS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE · PI REICH, DANIEL · 2010 to 2025
$53.4M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA NS003119
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diffusion-weighted MRS (DWS) of brain metabolites enables the study of cell-specific alterations in tissue microstructure by probing the diffusion of intracellular metabolites. In particular, the diffusion properties of neuronal N-acetylaspartate (NAA), typically co-measured with N-acetylaspartyl glutamate (NAAG) (NAA + NAAG = tNAA), have been shown to be sensitive to intraneuronal/axonal damage in pathologies such as stroke and multiple sclerosis. Lacking, so far, are empirical assessments of the reproducibility of DWS measures across time and subjects, as well as a systematic investigation of the optimal acquisition parameters for DWS experiments, both of which are sorely needed for clinical applications of the method. In this study, we acquired comprehensive single-volume DWS datasets of the human corpus callosum at 3 T and 7 T. We investigated the inter- and intra-subject variability of empirical and modeled diffusion properties of tNAA [D(avg) (tNAA) and D(model) (tNAA), respectively]. Subsequently, we used a jackknife-like resampling approach to explore the variance of these properties in partial data subsets reflecting different total scan durations. The coefficients of variation (C(V)) and repeatability coefficients (C(R)) for D(avg) (tNAA) and D(model) (tNAA) were calculated for both 3 T and 7 T, with overall lower variability in the 7 T results. Although this work is limited to the estimation of the diffusion properties in the corpus callosum, we show that a careful choice of diffusion-weighting conditions at both field strengths allows the accurate measurement of tNAA diffusion properties in clinically relevant experimental time. Based on the resampling results, we suggest optimized acquisition schemes of 13-min duration at 3T and 10-min duration at 7 T, whilst retaining low variability (C(V) ≈ 8%) for the tNAA diffusion measures. Power calculations for the estimation of D(model )(tNAA) and D(avg) (tNAA) based on the suggested schemes show that less than 21 subjects per group are sufficient for the detection of a 10% effect between two groups in case-control studies.

Indexed as

AdultAspartic AcidCorpus CallosumDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansImage EnhancementMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMaleMolecular ImagingRadiation DosageReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityTissue DistributionAspartic AcidN-acetylaspartatediffusion-weighted MRSinter-subject variabilityintra-subject variabilitypower calculationswhite matter

Identifiers

PMID26084563
PMCPMC5082280
OpenAlexW1600095779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.