ReviewThe British journal of radiology2015
Exploiting biological and physical determinants of radiotherapy toxicity to individualize treatment.
Review in The British journal of radiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine Learning for Head and Neck Cancer: A Safe Bet?-A Clinically Oriented Systematic Review for the Radiation Oncologist.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Pooled it
- An efficient automated approach for accumulated dose estimation in prostate cancer radiotherapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Radiosensitivity Prediction of Tumor Patient Based on Deep Fusion of Pathological Images and Genomics.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Radiogenomics and the DNA damage response: opportunities for biomarker-guided radiosensitization in pancreatic cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Integrating genetic polymorphisms and clinical data to develop predictive models for skin toxicity in breast cancer radiation therapy.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2025Article
- Prediction of health-related quality-of-life results after lung stereotactic body radiotherapy using dose-volume parameters from functional mapping on Gallium-68 perfusion PET/CT.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2025Article
- Quantifying the dosimetric impact of online daily adaptation for MR-guided RT in cervical cancer.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2025Observational
- Safety Review of Radiotherapy for Tumor Patients with Implantable Cardiac Pacemaker.Acta Cardiologica Sinica · 2023Review
- Investigating ionizing radiation-induced changes in breast cancer cells using stimulated Raman scattering microscopy.Journal of biomedical optics · 2023Article
- Chromosomal radiosensitivity in oncological and non-oncological patients with rheumatoid arthritis and connective tissue diseases.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2023Article
- Rapid recruitment and IFN-I-mediated activation of monocytes dictate focal radiotherapy efficacy.Science immunology · 2023Article
- State of the art and new perspectives in surgical treatment of lung cancer: a narrative review.Translational cancer research · 2022Review
- Estimating the percentage of patients who might benefit from proton beam therapy instead of X-ray radiotherapy.The British journal of radiology · 2022Article
- Overview of health-related quality of life and toxicity of non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving curative-intent radiotherapy in a real-life setting (the REQUITE study).Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2022Observational
- Cell Senescence-Related Pathways Are Enriched in Breast Cancer Patients With Late Toxicity After Radiotherapy and Low Radiation-Induced Lymphocyte Apoptosis.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Biologically consistent dose accumulation using daily patient imaging.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2021Article
- Prediction of the Acute or Late Radiation Toxicity Effects in Radiotherapy Patients Using Ex Vivo Induced Biodosimetric Markers: A Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2020Review
- Harnessing genome-wide association studies to minimize adverse radiation-induced side effects.Radiation oncology journal · 2020Article
- Prediction of Radiosensitivity in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Based on Multiple Omics Data.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- Gut Microbiota and Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy.Cancers · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The recent advances in radiation delivery can improve tumour control probability (TCP) and reduce treatment-related toxicity. The use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in particular can reduce normal tissue toxicity, an objective in its own right, and can allow safe dose escalation in selected cases. Ideally, IMRT should be combined with image guidance to verify the position of the target, since patients, target and organs at risk can move day to day. Daily image guidance scans can be used to identify the position of normal tissue structures and potentially to compute the daily delivered dose. Fundamentally, it is still the tolerance of the normal tissues that limits radiotherapy (RT) dose and therefore tumour control. However, the dose-response relationships for both tumour and normal tissues are relatively steep, meaning that small dose differences can translate into clinically relevant improvements. Differences exist between individuals in the severity of toxicity experienced for a given dose of RT. Some of this difference may be the result of differences between the planned dose and the accumulated dose (DA). However, some may be owing to intrinsic differences in radiosensitivity of the normal tissues between individuals. This field has been developing rapidly, with the demonstration of definite associations between genetic polymorphisms and variation in toxicity recently described. It might be possible to identify more resistant patients who would be suitable for dose escalation, as well as more sensitive patients for whom toxicity could be reduced or avoided. Daily differences in delivered dose have been investigated within the VoxTox research programme, using the rectum as an example organ at risk. In patients with prostate cancer receiving curative RT, considerable daily variation in rectal position and dose can be demonstrated, although the median position matches the planning scan well. Overall, in 10 patients, the mean difference between planned and accumulated rectal equivalent uniform doses was -2.7 Gy (5%), and a dose reduction was seen in 7 of the 10 cases. If dose escalation was performed to take rectal dose back to the planned level, this should increase the mean TCP (as biochemical progression-free survival) by 5%. Combining radiogenomics with individual estimates of DA might identify almost half of patients undergoing radical RT who might benefit from either dose escalation, suggesting improved tumour cure or reduced toxicity or both.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.