Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26084276›Full record

Trial reportOrphanet journal of rare diseases2015

A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial studying the effects of Saccharomyces boulardii on the gastrointestinal tolerability, safety, and pharmacokinetics of miglustat.

Tatiana Remenova, Olivier Morand, Dominick Amato, Harbajan Chadha-Boreham, Scott Tsurutani, Thorsten Marquardt

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Clinical medicine insights. Gastroenterology · 2018
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Tatiana RemenovaActelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Gewerbestrasse 16, Allschwil, 4123, Switzerland. tatiana.remenova@actelion.com.
Olivier MorandActelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Gewerbestrasse 16, Allschwil, 4123, Switzerland. olivier.morand@actelion.com.
Dominick AmatoMount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada. damato@mtsinai.on.ca.
Harbajan Chadha-BorehamActelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Gewerbestrasse 16, Allschwil, 4123, Switzerland. harbajan.chadha-boreham@actelion.com.
Scott TsurutaniActelion Pharmaceuticals US, Inc., San Francisco, USA. scott.tsurutani@actelion.com.
Thorsten MarquardtMünster University Hospital, Münster, Germany. marquat@uni-muenster.de.
Actelion (Switzerland) · CHActelion (United States) · USMount Sinai Hospital · CAUniversity of Münster · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGastrointestinal (GI) disturbances such as diarrhea and flatulence are the most frequent adverse effects associated with miglustat therapy in type 1 Gaucher disease (GD1) and Niemann-Pick disease type C (NP-C), and the most common recorded reason for stopping treatment during clinical trials and in clinical practice settings. Miglustat-related GI disturbances are thought to arise from the inhibition of intestinal disaccharidases, mainly sucrase isomaltase. We report the effects of a co-administered dietary probiotic, S. boulardii, on the GI tolerability of miglustat in healthy adult subjects.

methodsIn a double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-period, two-treatment cross-over trial, healthy adult male and female subjects were randomly allocated to treatment sequences, A-B and B-A (treatment A - miglustat 100 mg t.i.d. + placebo; treatment B - miglustat 100 mg t.i.d. + S. boulardii [500 mg, b.i.d.]). GI tolerability data were collected in patient diaries. The primary endpoint was the total number of 'diarrhea days' (≥3 loose stools within a 24-h period meeting Bristol Stool Scores [BSS] 6-7) based on WHO criteria. Secondary endpoints comprised numerous other diarrhea and GI tolerability indices.

resultsTwenty-one subjects received randomized therapy in each treatment sequence (total N = 42), and overall, 37 (88 %) subjects completed the study. The total number of diarrhea days was <1.5 for both treatment sequences, and approximately 60 % of subjects did not experience diarrhea during either treatment period. The mean (SD) number of diarrhea days was lower with miglustat + S. boulardii (0.8 [2.4] days) than with miglustat + placebo (1.3 [2.4] days), but the paired treatment difference was not statistically significant (-0.5 [2.4] days; p = 0.159). However, a significant treatment difference (-0.7 [1.9]; p < 0.05) was identified after post hoc exclusion of a clear outlier who had a very high number of diarrhea days (n = 13) and inconsistent GI tolerability reporting. The incidence of the GI AEs was higher with miglustat + placebo (82 %) than with miglustat + S. boulardii (73 %). There were no between-treatment differences in miglustat pharmacokinetics.

conclusionsAlthough the primary endpoint was not met, the results of the post-hoc analysis suggest that co-administration of miglustat with S. boulardii might improve GI tolerability.

Indexed as

Saccharomyces1-DeoxynojirimycinAdultCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodEnzyme InhibitorsFemaleGastrointestinal TractHumansMaleMiddle AgedPlacebos1-DeoxynojirimycinEnzyme InhibitorsmiglustatPlacebos

Identifiers

PMID26084276
PMCPMC4501118
OpenAlexW1747355100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.