Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26084274›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2015

Phasing amplicon sequencing on Illumina Miseq for robust environmental microbial community analysis.

Liyou Wu, Chongqing Wen, Yujia Qin, Huaqun Yin, Qichao Tu, Joy D Van Nostrand, Tong Yuan, Menting Yuan, Ye Deng, Jizhong Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 133 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
133citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

133 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Gut protist diversity in Eurasian beavers (International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Novel CRISPR/Cas9-DerivedInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

73 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Liyou WuInstitute for Environmental Genomics, and Department of Microbiology and Plant Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, 73019, USA. lwu@rccc.ou.edu.
Chongqing WenInstitute for Environmental Genomics, and Department of Microbiology and Plant Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, 73019, USA. wphage@gmail.com.
Yujia QinInstitute for Environmental Genomics, and Department of Microbiology and Plant Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, 73019, USA. yujia.qin-10@ou.edu.
Huaqun YinInstitute for Environmental Genomics, and Department of Microbiology and Plant Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, 73019, USA. yinhuaqun@gmail.com.
Qichao TuInstitute for Environmental Genomics, and Department of Microbiology and Plant Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, 73019, USA. qichao@ou.edu.
Joy D Van NostrandInstitute for Environmental Genomics, and Department of Microbiology and Plant Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, 73019, USA. joy.vannostrand@ou.edu.
Tong YuanInstitute for Environmental Genomics, and Department of Microbiology and Plant Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, 73019, USA. tyuan@ou.edu.
Menting YuanInstitute for Environmental Genomics, and Department of Microbiology and Plant Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, 73019, USA. maggieyuan@ou.edu.
Ye DengInstitute for Environmental Genomics, and Department of Microbiology and Plant Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, 73019, USA. dengye1210@hotmail.com.
Jizhong ZhouInstitute for Environmental Genomics, and Department of Microbiology and Plant Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, 73019, USA. jzhou@ou.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough high-throughput sequencing, such as Illumina-based technologies (e.g. MiSeq), has revolutionized microbial ecology, adaptation of amplicon sequencing for environmental microbial community analysis is challenging due to the problem of low base diversity.

resultsA new phasing amplicon sequencing approach (PAS) was developed by shifting sequencing phases among different community samples from both directions via adding various numbers of bases (0-7) as spacers to both forward and reverse primers. Our results first indicated that the PAS method substantially ameliorated the problem of unbalanced base composition. Second, the PAS method substantially improved the sequence read base quality (an average of 10 % higher of bases above Q30). Third, the PAS method effectively increased raw sequence throughput (~15 % more raw reads). In addition, the PAS method significantly increased effective reads (9-47 %) and the effective read sequence length (16-96 more bases) after quality trim at Q30 with window 5. In addition, the PAS method reduced half of the sequencing errors (0.54-1.1 % less). Finally, two-step PCR amplification of the PAS method effectively ameliorated the amplification biases introduced by the long barcoded PCR primers.

conclusionThe developed strategy is robust for 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. In addition, a similar strategy could also be used for sequencing other genes important to ecosystem functional processes.

Indexed as

ArchaeaBacteriaDNA, ArchaealDNA, BacterialDNA PrimersDNA, RibosomalEnvironmental MicrobiologyHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansSalivaSequence Analysis, DNADNA, ArchaealDNA, BacterialDNA PrimersDNA, Ribosomal

Identifiers

PMID26084274
PMCPMC4472414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.