Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26083950›Full record

Trial reportCancer biotherapy & radiopharmaceuticals2015

Dendritic Versus Tumor Cell Presentation of Autologous Tumor Antigens for Active Specific Immunotherapy in Metastatic Melanoma: Impact on Long-Term Survival by Extent of Disease at the Time of Treatment.

Robert O Dillman, Edward F McClay, Neil M Barth, Thomas T Amatruda, Lee S Schwartzberg, Khosrow Mahdavi, Cristina de Leon, Robin E Ellis, Carol DePriest

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer biotherapy & radiopharmaceuticals, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Robert O Dillman1 Caladrius Biosciences, Inc. , Irvine, California.
Edward F McClay2 California Cancer Associates for Research and Excellence (cCARE) , Institute for Melanoma Research & Education , Encinitas California.
Neil M Barth3 Genomics Institute Inc. , Laguna Beach, California.
Thomas T Amatruda4 Minnesota Oncology , Fridley, Minnesota.
Lee S Schwartzberg5 The West Clinic , Memphis, Tennessee.
Khosrow Mahdavi6 Newport Doctors Medical Group , Newport Beach, California.
Cristina de Leon7 Hoag Institute for Research and Education , Newport Beach, California.
Robin E Ellis7 Hoag Institute for Research and Education , Newport Beach, California.
Carol DePriest8 Cancer Biotherapy Research Group , Franklin, Tennessee.
Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian · USCalifornia Cancer Associates for Research and Excellence · USCampbell Clinic · USDoctors Medical Center · USID Genomics (United States) · USMinnesota Oncology · USNeostem (United States) · USRare Disease Therapeutics (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In patients with metastatic melanoma, sequential single-arm and randomized phase II trials with a therapeutic vaccine consisting of autologous dendritic cells (DCs) loaded with antigens from self-renewing, proliferating, irradiated autologous tumor cells (DC-TC) showed superior survival compared with similar patients immunized with irradiated tumor cells (TC). We wished to determine whether this difference was evident in cohorts who at the time of treatment had (1) no evidence of disease (NED) or (2) had detectable disease. Eligibility criteria and treatment schedules were the same for all three trials. Pooled data confirmed that overall survival (OS) was longer in 72 patients treated with DC-TC compared with 71 patients treated with TC (median OS 60 versus 22 months; 5-year OS 51% versus 32%, p=0.004). Treatment with DC-TC was associated with longer OS in both cohorts. Among 70 patients who were NED at the time that treatment was started, OS was better for DC-TC: 5-year OS 73% versus 43% (p=0.015). Among 73 patients who had detectable metastases, OS was better for DC-TC: median 38.8 months versus 14.7 months, 5-year OS 33% versus 20% (p=0.025). This approach is promising as an adjunct to other therapies in patients who have had metastatic melanoma.

Indexed as

Tumor BurdenAntigen PresentationCancer VaccinesDendritic CellsFemaleGranulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorHumansImmunotherapyInterferon-gammaMaleMelanomaMelanoma-Specific AntigensMiddle AgedNeoplastic Stem CellsSkin NeoplasmsSurvival RateCancer VaccinesGranulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorInterferon-gammaMelanoma-Specific Antigensactive specific immunotherapycancer stem cellsdendritic cellsmelanomatherapeutic cancer vaccines

Identifiers

PMID26083950
PMCPMC4492594
OpenAlexW1939976784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.