ReviewInvestigative radiology2015
The Changing World of Breast Cancer: A Radiologist's Perspective.
Review in Investigative radiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hybrid transformer-based model for mammogram classification by integrating prior and current images.Medical physics · 2025Article
- Comparison of Fused Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Using Unenhanced MRI and Abbreviated Post-Contrast-Enhanced MRI in Patients with Breast Cancer.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
- Hsa_circ_0002496 promotes the growth, angiogenesis, and stemness of breast cancer cells via miR-433-3p/YWHAZ cascade.Thoracic cancer · 2023Article
- Tensor-Based Learning for Detecting Abnormalities on Digital Mammograms.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Breast Dense Tissue Segmentation with Noisy Labels: A Hybrid Threshold-Based and Mask-Based Approach.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Diffusion tensor imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging on axillary lymph node status in breast cancer patients.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2022Article
- Breast Cancer Subtypes and Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systemic Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- XGboost Prediction Model Based on 3.0T Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Improves the Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI BiRADS 4 Masses.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- A 32-channel receive array coil for bilateral breast imaging and spectroscopy at 7T.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2021Article
- A review on recent advancements in diagnosis and classification of cancers using artificial intelligence.BioMedicine · 2020Review
- Anticancer Activity of Tubulosine through Suppression of Interleukin-6-Induced Janus Kinase 2/Signal Transducer and Activation of Transcription 3 Signaling.Journal of breast cancer · 2019Article
- Quantitative Multiparametric Breast Ultrasound: Application of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Elastography Leads to an Improved Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Lesions.Investigative radiology · 2019Article
- Dynamics of breast imaging research: A global scoping review and Sino-Australian comparison case study.PloS one · 2019Article
- Potential of Noncontrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Characterization of Breast Lesions: Intraindividual Comparison With Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Investigative radiology · 2018Article
- Understanding indications and defining guidelines for breast magnetic resonance imaging.SA journal of radiology · 2018Review
- Occurrence of Residual Cancer Within Re-excisions After Subcutaneous Mastectomy of Invasive Breast Cancer and Ductal CarcinomaIn vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Compared with other fields of medicine, there is hardly an area that has seen such fast development as the world of breast cancer. Indeed, the way we treat breast cancer has changed fundamentally over the past decades. Breast imaging has always been an integral part of this change, and it undergoes constant adjustment to new ways of thinking. This relates not only to the technical tools we use for diagnosing breast cancer but also to the way diagnostic information is used to guide treatment. There is a constant change of concepts for and attitudes toward breast cancer, and a constant flux of new ideas, new treatment approaches, and new insights into the molecular and biological behavior of this disease. Clinical breast radiologists and even more so, clinician scientists, interested in breast imaging need to keep abreast with this rapidly changing world. Diagnostic or treatment approaches that are considered useful today may be abandoned tomorrow. Approaches that seem irrelevant or far too extravagant today may prove clinically useful and adequate next year. Radiologists must constantly question what they do, and align their clinical aims and research objectives with the changing needs of contemporary breast oncology. Moreover, knowledge about the past helps better understand present debates and controversies. Accordingly, in this article, we provide an overview on the evolution of breast imaging and breast cancer treatment, describe current areas of research, and offer an outlook regarding the years to come.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.