Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26083489›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Genomic Comparison of Non-Typhoidal Salmonella enterica Serovars Typhimurium, Enteritidis, Heidelberg, Hadar and Kentucky Isolates from Broiler Chickens.

Akhilesh S Dhanani, Glenn Block, Ken Dewar, Vincenzo Forgetta, Edward Topp, Robert G Beiko, Moussa S Diarra

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Worldwide Epidemiology ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. A commercial bacteriophage cocktail failed to decolonize Zophobas morio larvae and promoted overgrowth of an OXA-48-producing Salmonella enterica.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Emerging Resistance and Virulence Patterns inAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Emergence and Comparative Genome Analysis ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Fosfomycin resistance mechanisms inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
  9. Food Is Reservoir of MDRMicroorganisms · 2022
    Article
  10. Antimicrobial resistance in the globalized food chain: a One Health perspective applied to the poultry industry.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Non-Antibiotics Strategies to ControlAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Review
  13. Genomic and Evolutionary Analysis ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles ofFoodborne pathogens and disease · 2020
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Transcriptomic Analysis, Motility and Biofilm Formation Characteristics ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Akhilesh S DhananiFaculty of Computer Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 4R2, Canada.
Glenn BlockPacific Agri-Food Research Center, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC), Agassiz, British Columbia, V0M 1A0, Canada.
Ken DewarMcGill University and Genome Quebec Innovation Centre, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 1A4, Canada.
Vincenzo ForgettaLady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Montréal, Québec, H3T 1E2, Canada.
Edward ToppSouthern Crop Protection and Food Research Centre, AAFC, London, Ontario, N5V 4T3, Canada.
Robert G BeikoFaculty of Computer Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 4R2, Canada.
Moussa S DiarraPacific Agri-Food Research Center, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC), Agassiz, British Columbia, V0M 1A0, Canada.
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada · CADalhousie University · CAJewish General Hospital · CALondon Research and Development CentreMcGill University and Génome Québec Innovation Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNon-typhoidal Salmonella enterica serovars, associated with different foods including poultry products, are important causes of bacterial gastroenteritis worldwide. The colonization of the chicken gut by S. enterica could result in the contamination of the environment and food chain. The aim of this study was to compare the genomes of 25 S. enterica serovars isolated from broiler chicken farms to assess their intra- and inter-genetic variability, with a focus on virulence and antibiotic resistance characteristics. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDING: The genomes of 25 S. enterica isolates covering five serovars (ten Typhimurium including three monophasic 4,[5],12:i:, four Enteritidis, three Hadar, four Heidelberg and four Kentucky) were sequenced. Most serovars were clustered in strongly supported phylogenetic clades, except for isolates of serovar Enteritidis that were scattered throughout the tree. Plasmids of varying sizes were detected in several isolates independently of serovars. Genes associated with the IncF plasmid and the IncI1 plasmid were identified in twelve and four isolates, respectively, while genes associated with the IncQ plasmid were found in one isolate. The presence of numerous genes associated with Salmonella pathogenicity islands (SPIs) was also confirmed. Components of the type III and IV secretion systems (T3SS and T4SS) varied in different isolates, which could explain in part, differences of their pathogenicity in humans and/or persistence in broilers. Conserved clusters of genes in the T3SS were detected that could be used in designing effective strategies (diagnostic, vaccination or treatments) to combat Salmonella. Antibiotic resistance genes (CMY, aadA, ampC, florR, sul1, sulI, tetAB, and srtA) and class I integrons were detected in resistant isolates while all isolates carried multidrug efflux pump systems regardless of their antibiotic susceptibility profile. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This study showed that the predominant Salmonella serovars in broiler chickens harbor genes encoding adhesins, flagellar proteins, T3SS, iron acquisition systems, and antibiotic and metal resistance genes that may explain their pathogenicity, colonization ability and persistence in chicken. The existence of mobile genetic elements indicates that isolates from a given serovar could acquire and transfer genetic material. Conserved genes in the T3SS and T4SS that we have identified are promising candidates for identification of diagnostic, antimicrobial or vaccine targets for the control of Salmonella in broiler chickens.

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialGenomic IslandsAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Secretion SystemsChickensDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPhylogenyPlasmidsPoultry DiseasesSalmonella entericaSalmonella Infections, AnimalAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Secretion Systems

Identifiers

PMID26083489
PMCPMC4470630
OpenAlexW4243245296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.