Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26083429›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

A Virulent Babesia bovis Strain Failed to Infect White-Tailed Deer (Odocoileus virginianus).

Massaro W Ueti, Pia U Olafson, Jeanne M Freeman, Wendell C Johnson, Glen A Scoles

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The GP-45 Protein, a Highly Variable Antigen fromPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  5. Babesiosis and Theileriosis in North America.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  6. Rapid Discovery and Detection ofInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Using White-tailed Deer (Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Massaro W UetiUSDA, ARS, Animal Disease Research Unit, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, United States of America.
Pia U OlafsonUSDA, ARS, Knipling-Bushland United States Livestock Insects Research Laboratory, Kerrville, Texas, United States of America.
Jeanne M FreemanUSDA, ARS, Knipling-Bushland United States Livestock Insects Research Laboratory, Kerrville, Texas, United States of America.
Wendell C JohnsonUSDA, ARS, Animal Disease Research Unit, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, United States of America.
Glen A ScolesUSDA, ARS, Animal Disease Research Unit, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, United States of America.
Washington State University · USKnipling-Bushland U.S. Livestock Insects Research Laboratory · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wildlife are an important component in the vector-host-pathogen triangle of livestock diseases, as they maintain biological vectors that transmit pathogens and can serve as reservoirs for such infectious pathogens. Babesia bovis is a tick-borne pathogen, vectored by cattle fever ticks, Rhipicephalus spp., that can cause up to 90% mortality in naive adult cattle. While cattle are the primary host for cattle fever ticks, wild and exotic ungulates, including white-tailed deer (WTD), are known to be viable alternative hosts. The presence of cattle fever tick populations resistant to acaricides raises concerns regarding the possibility of these alternative hosts introducing tick-borne babesial parasites into areas free of infection. Understanding the B. bovis reservoir competence of these alternative hosts is critical to mitigating the risk of introduction. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that WTD are susceptible to infection with a B. bovis strain lethal to cattle. Two groups of deer were inoculated intravenously with either B. bovis blood stabilate or a larval extract supernatant containing sporozoites from infected R. microplus larvae. The collective data demonstrated that WTD are neither a transient host nor reservoir of B. bovis. This conclusion is supported by the failure of B. bovis to establish an infection in deer regardless of inoculum. Although specific antibody was detected for a short period in the WTD, the PCR results were consistently negative at multiple time points throughout the experiment and blood from WTD that had been exposed to parasite, transferred into naïve recipient susceptible calves, failed to establish infection. In contrast, naïve steers inoculated intravenously with either B. bovis blood stabilate or the larval extract supernatant containing sporozoites rapidly succumbed to disease. These findings provide evidence that WTD are not an epidemiological component in the maintenance of B. bovis infectivity to livestock.

Indexed as

AnimalsBabesia bovisBabesiosisCattleCattle DiseasesDeerDNA, ProtozoanFluorescent Antibody TechniqueFluorescent Antibody Technique, IndirectTick InfestationsUnited StatesDNA, Protozoan

Identifiers

PMID26083429
PMCPMC4471175
OpenAlexW562439639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.