Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26083354›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Genome-Wide Specific Selection in Three Domestic Sheep Breeds.

Huihua Wang, Li Zhang, Jiaxve Cao, Mingming Wu, Xiaomeng Ma, Zhen Liu, Ruizao Liu, Fuping Zhao, Caihong Wei, Lixin Du

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Identification ofFrontiers in genetics · 2022
    Article
  17. Identification ofGenes · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Huihua WangInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China, Beijing, China.
Li ZhangInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China, Beijing, China.
Jiaxve CaoInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China, Beijing, China.
Mingming WuInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China, Beijing, China.
Xiaomeng MaInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China, Beijing, China.
Zhen LiuInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China, Beijing, China.
Ruizao LiuInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China, Beijing, China.
Fuping ZhaoInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China, Beijing, China.
Caihong WeiInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China, Beijing, China.
Lixin DuInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China, Beijing, China.
Institute of Animal Sciences · CNChinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommercial sheep raised for mutton grow faster than traditional Chinese sheep breeds. Here, we aimed to evaluate genetic selection among three different types of sheep breed: two well-known commercial mutton breeds and one indigenous Chinese breed.

resultsWe first combined locus-specific branch lengths and di statistical methods to detect candidate regions targeted by selection in the three different populations. The results showed that the genetic distances reached at least medium divergence for each pairwise combination. We found these two methods were highly correlated, and identified many growth-related candidate genes undergoing artificial selection. For production traits, APOBR and FTO are associated with body mass index. For meat traits, ALDOA, STK32B and FAM190A are related to marbling. For reproduction traits, CCNB2 and SLC8A3 affect oocyte development. We also found two well-known genes, GHR (which affects meat production and quality) and EDAR (associated with hair thickness) were associated with German mutton merino sheep. Furthermore, four genes (POL, RPL7, MSL1 and SHISA9) were associated with pre-weaning gain in our previous genome-wide association study.

conclusionsOur results indicated that combine locus-specific branch lengths and di statistical approaches can reduce the searching ranges for specific selection. And we got many credible candidate genes which not only confirm the results of previous reports, but also provide a suite of novel candidate genes in defined breeds to guide hybridization breeding.

Indexed as

BreedingGenomeMeatAnimalsBody WeightGenetic LociGenome-Wide Association StudyHybridization, GeneticPhenotypeSelection, GeneticSheepSheep, Domestic

Identifiers

PMID26083354
PMCPMC4471085
OpenAlexW901216539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.