ArticlePloS one2015
Understanding Low-Acuity Visits to the Pediatric Emergency Department.
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Parental Smoking Cessation Intervention in the Pediatric Emergency Setting: A Randomized Trial.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Trial
- Impact of pediatric urgent care clinics on emergency department utilization and patient flow: a pre-post cohort study in Saudi Arabia.BMC emergency medicine · 2026Observational
- Parental decision-making for non-urgent emergency department presentations in Victoria, Australia.Journal of child health care : for professionals working with children in the hospital and community · 2026Article
- Coconstructing CHAMP, an Artificial Intelligence Chatbot for Pediatric Infectious Symptoms Management: Protocol for a Multiphase Participatory Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Primary care among newborns at a Canadian urban center: an observational study.BMC pediatrics · 2026Observational
- Emergency Department Visits for Minor Illnesses Among Recent Refugee and Immigrant Children.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Driving factors in pediatric emergency department use: an ecological retrospective study.PloS one · 2026Article
- Operational Impact of Redirection From the Pediatric Emergency Department: A Matched Cross-Sectional Study.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2025Article
- Identifying the needs of parents admitted to the paediatric emergency department.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Feasibility of Direct-Access Physical Therapy for Concussion Management in the Pediatric Emergency Department: A Pilot Implementation Study.Physical therapy · 2025Article
- Maternal Disability and Emergency Department Use for Infants.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Assessment of Medical Test Overuse and Its Impact on Pediatric Emergency Department Outcomes in Upper Respiratory Tract Infections in a University Hospital in Lithuania.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Strength in the gap: A rapid review of principles and practices for urgent care centres.Healthcare management forum · 2023Review
- Non-urgent emergency department attendances in children: a retrospective observational analysis.Emergency medicine journal : EMJ · 2022Observational
- Development and validation of an algorithm using health administrative data to define patient attachment to primary care providers.Journal of health organization and management · 2021Article
- Pediatric admissions to emergency departments of North-Western Italy during COVID-19 pandemic: A retrospective observational study.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCanadian pediatric emergency department visits are increasing, with a disproportionate increase in low-acuity visits locally (33% of volume in 2008-09, 41% in 2011-12). We sought to understand: 1) presentation patterns and resource implications; 2) parents' perceptions and motivations; and 3) alternate health care options considered prior to presenting with low-acuity problems.
methodsWe conducted a prospective cohort study at our tertiary pediatric emergency department serving two provinces to explore differences between patients with and without a primary care provider. During four, 2-week study periods over 1 year, parents of low-acuity visits received an anonymous survey. Presentation times, interventions, diagnoses and dispositions were captured on a data collection form linked to the survey by study number.
resultsParents completed 2,443 surveys (74.1% response rate), with survey-data collection form pairs available for 2,146 visits. Overall, 89.7% of respondents had a primary care provider; 68% were family physicians. Surprisingly, 40% of visits occurred during weekday office hours and 27.3% occurred within 4 hours of symptom onset; 67.5% of those early presenters were for injuries. Few parents sought care from their primary care provider (25%), health information line (20.7%), or urgent care clinic (18.5%); 36% reported that they believed their child's problem required the emergency department. Forty-five percent required only a history, physical exam and reassurance; only 11% required an intervention not available in an office setting. Patients without a primary care provider were significantly more likely to present during weekday office hours (p = 0.003), have longer symptom duration (p<0.001), and not know of other options (p = 0.001).
conclusionsMany parents seek pediatric emergency department care for low-acuity problems despite their child having a primary care provider. Ensuring timely access to these providers may help reduce pediatric emergency department overuse. Educational initiatives should inform parents about low-acuity problems and where appropriate care can/should be accessed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.