Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26083331›Full record

ArticleJournal of lower genital tract disease2015

Gay and Bisexual Men's Willingness to Use a Self-Collected Anal Cancer Screening Test.

Joshua A Thompson, Paul L Reiter, Annie-Laurie McRee, Jennifer L Moss, Noel T Brewer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of lower genital tract disease, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Preventive healthcare services use among transgender young adults.The international journal of transgenderism · 2018
    Article
  10. Monitoring the impact of HPV vaccine in males-Considerations and challenges.Papillomavirus research (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2016
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joshua A Thompson1UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC; 2Divison of Cancer Prevention and Control, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; 3Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; 4Division of Health Behavior and Health Promotion, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; and 5Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC.
Paul L Reiter
Annie-Laurie McRee
Jennifer L Moss
Noel T Brewer
The Ohio State University · USUNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center

Funding

Translational Therapeutics Research Program (TT)P30CA016058 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Tasleem J Padamsee · 1985 to 2026
$132.3M
LINEBERGER CANCER CONTROL EDUCATION PROGRAMR25CA057726 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI EARP, JO ANNE L, RIBISL, KURT M. · 1992 to 2016
$8.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016058NCI NIH HHS P30CA016058NCI NIH HHS R25 CA057726NCI NIH HHS R25CA57726
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe investigated gay and bisexual men's willingness to self-administer an anal cancer screening test at home.

methodsWe conducted 2 national, online cross-sectional surveys of self-identified gay and bisexual men: Study I in 2009 with men ages 20 to 59 (n = 306) and Study II in 2013 with men ages 18 to 26 (n = 428). We used multivariate logistic regression analyses to determine variables associated with willingness to self-administer the screening test.

resultsMost men were willing to self-administer an anal cancer screening test (78% Study I; 67% Study II). In Study I, willingness was higher among men who trusted anal Paps to find treatable cancer (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.47; 95% CI, 1.04-2.09) and who believed that men who have sex with men should be screened for anal cancer between 1 and 3 years vs. other intervals (aOR = 2.19; 95% CI, 1.17-4.10). In Study II, willingness was higher among men who perceived greater likelihood of anal cancer (aOR = 1.57; 95% CI, 1.12-2.20). Their most common concerns were not performing the test correctly and inaccuracy of results.

conclusionsMany gay and bisexual men were willing to self-administer anal cancer screening tests at home. If routine screening is warranted, self-collected home testing could improve participation.

Indexed as

BisexualityHomosexuality, MalePatient Acceptance of Health CareAdolescentAdultAnus NeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesEarly Detection of CancerHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedSpecimen HandlingYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26083331
PMCPMC4583826
OpenAlexW2414272973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.