Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26083229›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2015

A Review of Membrane-Based Biosensors for Pathogen Detection.

Remko van den Hurk, Stephane Evoy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Emerging Designs and Applications for Biomembrane Biosensors.Annual review of analytical chemistry (Palo Alto, Calif.) · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Certain, but Not All, Tetraether Lipids from the Thermoacidophilic ArchaeonInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Dye-sensitized TiONanoscale advances · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Nanosensors for water quality monitoring.Nature nanotechnology · 2018
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Remko van den HurkDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Alberta Edmonton, Alberta, AB T6G 2V4, Canada. remko@ualberta.ca.
Stephane EvoyDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Alberta Edmonton, Alberta, AB T6G 2V4, Canada. sevoy@ualberta.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biosensors are of increasing interest for the detection of bacterial pathogens in many applications such as human, animal and plant health, as well as food and water safety. Membranes and membrane-like structures have been integral part of several pathogen detection platforms. Such structures may serve as simple mechanical support, function as a part of the transduction mechanism, may be used to filter out or concentrate pathogens, and may be engineered to specifically house active proteins. This review focuses on membrane materials, their associated biosensing applications, chemical linking procedures, and transduction mechanisms. The sensitivity of membrane biosensors is discussed, and the state of the field is evaluated and summarized.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesMembranes, ArtificialBacteriaCollodionLipid BilayersMolecular ProbesPolycarboxylate CementVirusesCollodionLipid BilayersMembranes, ArtificialMolecular ProbespolycarbonatePolycarboxylate Cementbacteriabiosensorsfood safetymembranespathogenswater safety

Identifiers

PMID26083229
PMCPMC4507637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.