ArticleBrain injury2015
Effect of luminance on the visually-evoked potential in visually-normal individuals and in mTBI/concussion.
Article in Brain injury, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neurophysiological Effects of Repeated Soccer Heading in Youth.Journal of biomechanical engineering · 2023Trial
- Model based fitting of pattern reversal visually evoked potentials provides a reliable characterization of waveform components.Biomedical signal processing and control · 2025Article
- Simulating the Effects of Partial Neural Conduction Delays in the Visual Evoked Potential.Translational vision science & technology · 2024Article
- Visual Evoked Potential Effects on Magnocellular and Parvocellular Pathways from Athletes After Mild Traumatic Brain Injuries.Neuroscience insights · 2024Article
- Interhemispheric transfer time and concussion in adolescents: A longitudinal study using response time and event-related potential measures.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Article
- Developmental Effects on Pattern Visual Evoked Potentials Characterized by Principal Component Analysis.Translational vision science & technology · 2021Article
- The Pulfrich Phenomenon: Practical Implications of the Assessment of Cases and Effectiveness of Treatment.Neuro-ophthalmology (Aeolus Press) · 2018Article
- MR-compatible, 3.8 inch dual organic light-emitting diode (OLED) in-bore display for functional MRI.PloS one · 2018Article
- Understanding the effects of mild traumatic brain injury on the pupillary light reflex.Concussion (London, England) · 2017Review
- Visually Evoked Potential Markers of Concussion History in Patients with Convergence Insufficiency.Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry · 2017Article
- Adaptive reorganization of retinogeniculate axon terminals in dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus following experimental mild traumatic brain injury.Experimental neurology · 2017Article
- Quantitative electroencephalograms and neuro-optometry: a case study that explores changes in electrophysiology while wearing therapeutic eyeglasses.Neurophotonics · 2017Article
- Iconic faces are not real faces: enhanced emotion detection and altered neural processing as faces become more iconic.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2016Article
- Visual evoked potential evaluation following brain injury in school-aged children.Romanian journal of ophthalmologyArticle
- The effect of spectral filters on VEP and alpha-wave responses.Journal of optometryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo assess quantitatively the effect of luminance on VEP amplitude and latency in visually-normals (VN) and patients with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI).
methodsVN individuals (n = 20) and those with mTBI (n = 19) participated. Those with mTBI were assessed 1-10 years post-injury (mean = 4.97 years), with the exception of one subject. Pattern VEP testing was employed using the DIOPSYS™ NOVA-TR system, with a 74 cd m
resultsIn both groups, mean VEP amplitude reduced with decrease in luminance (p < 0.05). At each luminance level, the mean VEP amplitude was significantly lower in mTBI than in the VN population (p < 0.05). In both groups, the mean VEP latency increased progressively with reduction in luminance (p < 0.05), with it being significantly higher in mTBI than in the VN population (p < 0.05).
conclusionsHigh luminance levels produced an optimal VEP response in both populations. VEP amplitude was robust, whereas latency progressively increased in both groups as luminance decreased. The latency increase with decreased luminance was significantly larger in those with mTBI, thus suggesting that latency can be used to differentiate reliably between VN individuals and those with mTBI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.