ArticlePloS one2015
Prokaryotic Diversity in the Rhizosphere of Organic, Intensive, and Transitional Coffee Farms in Brazil.
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cultivable diversity and plant growth-promoting traits of free-living bacteria from coffee soils under contrasting fertilization systems.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2026Article
- Coffee phytobiome dynamics: integrating multitrophic interactions and plant physiology for climate-resilient production.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Rhizosphere and fruit microbiome variation acrossFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Functional Specialisation and Diversity Shape the Rhizosphere Microbiota of Cacao and Coffee in the Amazonas Region, Peru.Environmental microbiology reports · 2025Article
- Deciphering soil nematode-bacteria-fungi community composition and functional dynamics in coffee agroecosystems under conventional and sustainable management practices in Costa Rica.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2025Article
- Geographic variation in fungal diversity associated with leaf spot symptoms ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Irradiance level and elevation shape the soil microbiome communities of Coffea arabica L.Environmental microbiome · 2024Article
- Microbiota of arabica coffee: insights from soil to fruit.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2024Review
- Article
- Essential Oils and Antagonistic Microorganisms as Eco-Friendly Alternatives for Coffee Leaf Rust Control.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Article
- Stochastic Inoculum, Biotic Filtering and Species-Specific Seed Transmission Shape the Rare Microbiome of Plants.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Brazilian Coffee Production and the Future Microbiome and Mycotoxin Profile Considering the Climate Change Scenario.Microorganisms · 2021Review
- Seed-Transmitted Bacteria and Fungi Dominate Juvenile Plant Microbiomes.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Soil fungal communities differ between shaded and sun-intensive coffee plantations in El Salvador.PloS one · 2020Article
- Archaea in Natural and Impacted Brazilian Environments.Archaea (Vancouver, B.C.) · 2016Review
- Looking for Rhizobacterial Ecological Indicators in Agricultural Soils Using 16S rRNA metagenomic Amplicon Data.PloS one · 2016Article
- Leaf-associated bacterial microbiota of coffee and its correlation with manganese and calcium levels on leaves.Genetics and molecular biologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite a continuous rise in consumption of coffee over the past 60 years and recent studies showing positive benefits linked to human health, intensive coffee farming practices have been associated with environmental damage, risks to human health, and reductions in biodiversity. In contrast, organic farming has become an increasingly popular alternative, with both environmental and health benefits. This study aimed to characterize and determine the differences in the prokaryotic soil microbiology of three Brazilian coffee farms: one practicing intensive farming, one practicing organic farming, and one undergoing a transition from intensive to organic practices. Soil samples were collected from 20 coffee plant rhizospheres (soil directly influenced by the plant root exudates) and 10 control sites (soil 5 m away from the coffee plantation) at each of the three farms for a total of 90 samples. Profiling of 16S rRNA gene V4 regions revealed high levels of prokaryotic diversity in all three farms, with thousands of species level operational taxonomic units identified in each farm. Additionally, a statistically significant difference was found between each farm's coffee rhizosphere microbiome, as well as between coffee rhizosphere soils and control soils. Two groups of prokaryotes associated with the nitrogen cycle, the archaeal genus Candidatus Nitrososphaera and the bacterial order Rhizobiales were found to be abundant and statistically different in composition between the three farms and in inverse relationship to each other. Many of the nitrogen-fixing genera known to enhance plant growth were found in low numbers (e.g. Rhizobium, Agrobacter, Acetobacter, Rhodospirillum, Azospirillum), but the families in which they belong had some of the highest relative abundance in the dataset, suggesting many new groups may exist in these samples that can be further studied as potential plant growth-promoting bacteria to improve coffee production while diminishing negative environmental impacts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.