Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26083033›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Prokaryotic Diversity in the Rhizosphere of Organic, Intensive, and Transitional Coffee Farms in Brazil.

Adam Collins Caldwell, Lívia Carneiro Fidéles Silva, Cynthia Canêdo da Silva, Cleber Costa Ouverney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cultivable diversity and plant growth-promoting traits of free-living bacteria from coffee soils under contrasting fertilization systems.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Rhizosphere and fruit microbiome variation acrossFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Microbiota of arabica coffee: insights from soil to fruit.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Adam Collins CaldwellDepartment of Biological Sciences, San Jose State University, San Jose, California, 95192-0100, United States of America.
Lívia Carneiro Fidéles SilvaDepartment of Microbiology, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, MG, 36570, Brazil.
Cynthia Canêdo da SilvaDepartment of Microbiology, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, MG, 36570, Brazil.
Cleber Costa OuverneyDepartment of Biological Sciences, San Jose State University, San Jose, California, 95192-0100, United States of America.

Funding

Environmental Uncultivable Bacteria Model for Understanding Human PeriodontitisSC3GM082291 · NIGMS · SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI OUVERNEY, CLEBER COSTA · 2008 to 2013
$794k
NIGMS NIH HHS GM082291NIGMS NIH HHS SC3 GM082291
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite a continuous rise in consumption of coffee over the past 60 years and recent studies showing positive benefits linked to human health, intensive coffee farming practices have been associated with environmental damage, risks to human health, and reductions in biodiversity. In contrast, organic farming has become an increasingly popular alternative, with both environmental and health benefits. This study aimed to characterize and determine the differences in the prokaryotic soil microbiology of three Brazilian coffee farms: one practicing intensive farming, one practicing organic farming, and one undergoing a transition from intensive to organic practices. Soil samples were collected from 20 coffee plant rhizospheres (soil directly influenced by the plant root exudates) and 10 control sites (soil 5 m away from the coffee plantation) at each of the three farms for a total of 90 samples. Profiling of 16S rRNA gene V4 regions revealed high levels of prokaryotic diversity in all three farms, with thousands of species level operational taxonomic units identified in each farm. Additionally, a statistically significant difference was found between each farm's coffee rhizosphere microbiome, as well as between coffee rhizosphere soils and control soils. Two groups of prokaryotes associated with the nitrogen cycle, the archaeal genus Candidatus Nitrososphaera and the bacterial order Rhizobiales were found to be abundant and statistically different in composition between the three farms and in inverse relationship to each other. Many of the nitrogen-fixing genera known to enhance plant growth were found in low numbers (e.g. Rhizobium, Agrobacter, Acetobacter, Rhodospirillum, Azospirillum), but the families in which they belong had some of the highest relative abundance in the dataset, suggesting many new groups may exist in these samples that can be further studied as potential plant growth-promoting bacteria to improve coffee production while diminishing negative environmental impacts.

Indexed as

Soil MicrobiologyArchaeaBacteriaBiodiversityBrazilCoffeaDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicHumansNitrogenNitrogen FixationOrganic AgriculturePhylogenyRhizosphereRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSymbiosisNitrogenRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID26083033
PMCPMC4471275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.