ArticleJournal of intensive care2015
Eosinophil count at intensive care unit admission was not predictor of hospital mortality: results of a case control study.
Article in Journal of intensive care, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical implications of peripheral eosinophil count at diagnosis in patients newly diagnosed with microscopic polyangiitis and granulomatosis with polyangiitis.Arthritis research & therapy · 2023Article
- Evaluation of Hematological Parameters in Predicting Intensive Care Unit Admission in COVID-19 Patients.SN comprehensive clinical medicine · 2022Article
- The role of eosinophils in sepsis and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a scoping review.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2021Article
- TGFβ depletion does neither modulate acute E. coli-induced inflammatory immune responses nor impair the protective effect by chronic filarial infection.GMS infectious diseases · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPredicting mortality in the intensive care unit (ICU) is one of the biggest challenges in critical care medicine. Several studies have linked the presence of eosinopenia with adverse outcomes in different populations.
methodsWe performed a case control study to determine whether the eosinophil count at ICU admission was a predictor of hospital mortality. We included data from patients 18 years or older admitted to the medical or surgical ICU in a university hospital in northern of Mexico. Medical records of 86 non-survivors (cases) and 99 discharged alive patients (controls) were randomly reviewed; clinical records of patients with an ICU stay of less than 24 h and those whose information was incomplete were excluded.
resultsMedian of eosinophil count at ICU admission was 0.013 (interquartile range (IQR) 0.00 to 0.57) K/μL. There was no significant statistical difference in eosinophils at admission between survivors and non-survivors (0.014 [IQR 0.00 to 0.36] vs. 0.010 [IQR 0.00 to 0.57] K/μL, P = 0.35). In the multivariate analysis, APACHE II score at ICU admission and discharge were the only mortality predictors. Survivors had a significantly greater increase in eosinophil count during the first 7 days of ICU stay (0.104 [IQR -0.64 to 0.41] vs. 0.005 [IQR -1.79 to 0.43] K/μL, P = 0.004).
conclusionsIn our study, eosinophil count at ICU admission was not associated with increased hospital mortality. The larger increase in number of eosinophils observed during the first week of ICU stay in surviving patients deserves to be investigated further.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.