Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26082839›Full record

ArticleJournal of intensive care2015

Eosinophil count at intensive care unit admission was not predictor of hospital mortality: results of a case control study.

Emmanuel Jesús Escobar-Valdivia, Julio Edgardo González-Aguirre, Eunice Rebeca Carrillo-Cisneros, Karla Carolina Guerra-Leza, Roberto Mercado-Longoría

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of intensive care, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The role of eosinophils in sepsis and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a scoping review.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emmanuel Jesús Escobar-ValdiviaDepartment of Internal Medicine, "Dr. José E. González" University Hospital, Nuevo León Autonomous University, Av. Francisco I. Madero1500, Suburb: Mitras Centro, Monterrey, NL 64460 Mexico.
Julio Edgardo González-AguirreDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, "Dr. José E. González" University Hospital, Nuevo León Autonomous University, Av. Francisco I. Madero1500, Suburb: Mitras Centro, Monterrey, NL 64460 Mexico.
Eunice Rebeca Carrillo-CisnerosDepartment of Internal Medicine, "Dr. José E. González" University Hospital, Nuevo León Autonomous University, Av. Francisco I. Madero1500, Suburb: Mitras Centro, Monterrey, NL 64460 Mexico.
Karla Carolina Guerra-LezaDepartment of Internal Medicine, "Dr. José E. González" University Hospital, Nuevo León Autonomous University, Av. Francisco I. Madero1500, Suburb: Mitras Centro, Monterrey, NL 64460 Mexico.
Roberto Mercado-LongoríaDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, "Dr. José E. González" University Hospital, Nuevo León Autonomous University, Av. Francisco I. Madero1500, Suburb: Mitras Centro, Monterrey, NL 64460 Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPredicting mortality in the intensive care unit (ICU) is one of the biggest challenges in critical care medicine. Several studies have linked the presence of eosinopenia with adverse outcomes in different populations.

methodsWe performed a case control study to determine whether the eosinophil count at ICU admission was a predictor of hospital mortality. We included data from patients 18 years or older admitted to the medical or surgical ICU in a university hospital in northern of Mexico. Medical records of 86 non-survivors (cases) and 99 discharged alive patients (controls) were randomly reviewed; clinical records of patients with an ICU stay of less than 24 h and those whose information was incomplete were excluded.

resultsMedian of eosinophil count at ICU admission was 0.013 (interquartile range (IQR) 0.00 to 0.57) K/μL. There was no significant statistical difference in eosinophils at admission between survivors and non-survivors (0.014 [IQR 0.00 to 0.36] vs. 0.010 [IQR 0.00 to 0.57] K/μL, P = 0.35). In the multivariate analysis, APACHE II score at ICU admission and discharge were the only mortality predictors. Survivors had a significantly greater increase in eosinophil count during the first 7 days of ICU stay (0.104 [IQR -0.64 to 0.41] vs. 0.005 [IQR -1.79 to 0.43] K/μL, P = 0.004).

conclusionsIn our study, eosinophil count at ICU admission was not associated with increased hospital mortality. The larger increase in number of eosinophils observed during the first week of ICU stay in surviving patients deserves to be investigated further.

Indexed as

Critical careEosinophilsHospital mortality

Identifiers

PMID26082839
PMCPMC4469102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.