Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26082817›Full record

ArticleHereditary cancer in clinical practice2015

Tumour spectrum in non-BRCA hereditary breast cancer families in Sweden.

Camilla Wendt, Annika Lindblom, Brita Arver, Anna von Wachenfeldt, Sara Margolin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hereditary cancer in clinical practice, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Early detection of pancreatic cancer.The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2020
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Camilla WendtDepartment of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet Solna, S-17177 Stockholm, Sweden ; Department of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital Solna, S-17177 Stockholm, Sweden.
Annika LindblomDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Karolinska University Hospital Solna, S-17177 Stockholm, Sweden ; Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet Solna, S-17177 Stockholm, Sweden.
Brita ArverDepartment of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet Solna, S-17177 Stockholm, Sweden ; Department of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital Solna, S-17177 Stockholm, Sweden.
Anna von WachenfeldtDepartment of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet Solna, S-17177 Stockholm, Sweden ; Department of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital Solna, S-17177 Stockholm, Sweden.
Sara MargolinDepartment of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet Solna, S-17177 Stockholm, Sweden ; Department of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital Solna, S-17177 Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SEKarolinska University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundApproximately 30 % of all breast cancer is at least partly attributed to hereditary factors. Familial breast cancer is often inherited in the context of cancer syndromes. The most commonly mutated genes are BRCA1 and BRCA2 in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome. The genetic background in families with hereditary breast cancer without predisposing germ line mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 (non-BRCA families) is still to a large extent unclear even though progress has been made. The aim of this study was to compare cancer proportions in familial non-BRCA hereditary breast cancer compared to the general population in search of putative new breast cancer syndromes.

methodsPedigrees from 334 non-BRCA hereditary breast cancer families in the county of Stockholm, Sweden, were investigated and the distribution of cancer diagnoses other than breast cancer was compared with the distribution of cancer diagnoses in the general Swedish population in two reference years, 1970 and 2010. A cancer diagnosis was regarded as overrepresented in the non-BRCA families if the confidence interval was above both population reference values.

resultsWe found that endometrial cancer was overrepresented in the non-BRCA families with a 6.36 % proportion (CI 4.67-8.2) compared to the proportion in the general population in the reference years 1970 (3.07 %) and 2010 (2.64 %). Moreover tumours of the ovary, liver, pancreas and prostate were overrepresented.

conclusionIn conclusion, we found an overrepresentation of endometrial cancer in our cohort of hereditary non-BRCA families. Our result supports previous inconsistent reports of a putative breast and endometrial cancer syndrome. An association has been suggested in studies of families with several cases of breast cancer in close relatives or bilateral breast cancer. To clarify this issue we suggest further studies on a breast and endometrial cancer syndrome in cohorts with a strong pattern of hereditary breast cancer. Identifying new breast cancer syndromes is of importance to improve genetic counselling for women at risk and a first step towards detection of new susceptibility genes.

Indexed as

Breast cancerCancer syndromeEndometrial cancerFamily history

Identifiers

PMID26082817
PMCPMC4469256
OpenAlexW2136942924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.