Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26082691›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in systems neuroscience2015

Binocular misalignments elicited by altered gravity provide evidence for nonlinear central compensation.

Kara H Beaton, W Cary Huffman, Michael C Schubert

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Binocular Alignment Changes Between Sitting and Supine Positions in Patients with Dizziness.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2022
    Article
  4. Spatial Updating Depends on Gravity.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2020
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Prototype tests of vertical and torsional alignment nulling for screening vestibular function.Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kara H BeatonDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore, MD, USA.
W Cary HuffmanDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Loyola University Chicago, IL, USA.
Michael C SchubertDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore, MD, USA ; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore, MD, USA.
Johns Hopkins Medicine · USJohns Hopkins University · USLoyola University Chicago · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increased ocular positioning misalignments upon exposure to altered gravity levels (g-levels) have been strongly correlated with space motion sickness (SMS) severity, possibly due to underlying otolith asymmetries uncompensated in novel gravitational environments. We investigated vertical and torsional ocular positioning misalignments elicited by the 0 and 1.8 g g-levels of parabolic flight and used these data to develop a computational model to describe how such misalignments might arise. Ocular misalignments were inferred through two perceptual nulling tasks: Vertical Alignment Nulling (VAN) and Torsional Alignment Nulling (TAN). All test subjects exhibited significant differences in ocular misalignments in the novel g-levels, which we postulate to be the result of healthy individuals with 1 g-tuned central compensatory mechanisms unadapted to the parabolic flight environment. Furthermore, the magnitude and direction of ocular misalignments in hypo-g and hyper-g, in comparison to 1 g, were nonlinear and nonmonotonic. Previous linear models of central compensation do not predict this. Here we show that a single model of the form a + bg (ε), where a, b, and ε are the model parameters and g is the current g-level, accounts for both the vertical and torsional ocular misalignment data observed inflight. Furthering our understanding of oculomotor control is critical for the development of interventions that promote adaptation in spaceflight (e.g., countermeasures for novel g-level exposure) and terrestrial (e.g., rehabilitation protocols for vestibular pathology) environments.

Indexed as

gravitymodeloculomotorotolithparabolic flight

Identifiers

PMID26082691
PMCPMC4451361
OpenAlexW1574637649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.