ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2015
The status of bedside teaching in the United Kingdom: the student perspective.
Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review of the current challenges of bedside teaching for medical students in the UK.BMC medical education · 2026Pooled it
- Practical Considerations for Bedside Teaching: A Critical Application of Kolb's Experiential Learning Cycle.The clinical teacher · 2026Article
- How is modern bedside teaching structured? A video analysis of learning content, social and spatial structures.BMC medical education · 2022Article
- Validation of a questionnaire exploring patient attitudes towards bedside teaching.BMC medical education · 2022Review
- Sustained effects of faculty leadership development modules for clinical instructors of core competences education in Taiwan: a four-year explanatory case study.BMC medical education · 2020Article
- Patient participation in medical student teaching: a survey of hospital patients.BMC medical education · 2020Article
- Patient perspectives of bedside teaching in an obstetrics, Gynaecology and neonatology hospital.BMC medical education · 2020Article
- Implementing a Practical Global Health Curriculum: The Benefits and Challenges of Patient-Based Learning in the Community.Frontiers in public health · 2020Article
- Bedside teaching: everybody's but nobody's responsibility.Advances in medical education and practice · 2019Article
- Strategies for teaching in clinical rounds: A systematic review of the literature.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2019Review
- The status of ward-based clinical education: the medical students' opinion.Advances in medical education and practice · 2016Article
- Students' perspective of bedside teaching: A qualitative study.Pakistan journal of medical sciencesArticle
- Increasing urology exposure among undergraduates: A U.K. Perspective Authors' response.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du CanadaArticle
- Bed side teaching: Student's perception and its correlation with academic performance.Pakistan journal of medical sciencesArticle
- Bedside teaching without bedside - an introduction to clinical reasoning in COVID-19 times.GMS journal for medical educationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeBedside teaching holds a strong tradition as a key-learning platform for clinical examination in the basic medical clerkship. There is a growing body of literature expressing concern for its witnessed decline in medical school curricula. However, the views of students toward this patient-centered cornerstone in surgical education remain under-reported. The purpose of this study was to gain a nationwide perspective on bedside teaching according to medical students in the United Kingdom. MATERIALS AND
methodsAn adapted Delphi method was employed to formulate the question series as part of a multi-step process including a pilot study, which was used to construct this survey. The target population was medical undergraduates in the United Kingdom and participants were recruited via social media. Outcomes assessed included exposure to bedside teaching, perceived benefits of clinical simulation, and junior doctors as clinical teachers. Barriers to clinical examination were also evaluated.
resultsOverall, 368 completed surveys were received (completion rate 98.9%). Final year students were significantly more likely to report receiving insufficient bedside teaching (P<0.01). Seventy-eight percent of the study group agreed that clinical simulation is a good learning tool for clinical examination. Seventy percent of students felt junior doctors were as able as senior doctors to teach. Lack of confidence was identified as the commonest barrier to overcome when examining patients and two-thirds of students felt they burdened patients during bedside teaching.
conclusionThis prospective study confirms the exposure deficit, which medical students experience in bedside teaching. The junior doctor represents a dynamic clinical teacher in the face of working time directives. Peer learning is a novel solution to such pressures. Work is needed to re-establish the hospital wards as a supportive environment for student learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.