Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26082671›Full record

ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2015

Medical students' knowledge, attitude, and practice of complementary and alternative medicine: a pre-and post-exposure survey in Majmaah University, Saudi Arabia.

Mohammed Abdullah Al Mansour, Abdullah Mn Al-Bedah, Mohammed Othman AlRukban, Ibrahim S Elsubai, Elsadiq Yousif Mohamed, Ahmed Tawfik El Olemy, Asim Ah Khalil, Mohamed Km Khalil, Meshari Saleh Alqaed, Abdullah Almudaiheem and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. The prevalence extent of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) use among Saudis.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2017
    Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Mohammed Abdullah Al MansourCollege of Medicine, Majmaah University, Al Majma'ah, Saudi Arabia.
Abdullah Mn Al-BedahNational Center of Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Ministry of Health, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed Othman AlRukbanDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ibrahim S ElsubaiNational Center of Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Ministry of Health, Saudi Arabia.
Elsadiq Yousif MohamedDepartment of Community Medicine and Public Health, College of Medicine, Majmaah University, Al Majma'ah, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmed Tawfik El OlemyNational Center of Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Ministry of Health, Saudi Arabia.
Asim Ah KhalilNational Center of Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Ministry of Health, Saudi Arabia.
Mohamed Km KhalilNational Center of Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Ministry of Health, Saudi Arabia.
Meshari Saleh AlqaedNational Center of Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Ministry of Health, Saudi Arabia.
Abdullah AlmudaiheemNational Center of Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Ministry of Health, Saudi Arabia.
Waqas Sami MahmoudDepartment of Community Medicine and Public Health, College of Medicine, Majmaah University, Al Majma'ah, Saudi Arabia.
Khalid Altohami MedaniDepartment of Community Medicine and Public Health, College of Medicine, Majmaah University, Al Majma'ah, Saudi Arabia.
Naseem Akhtar QureshiNational Center of Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Ministry of Health, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidently, complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is a recognized medical practice that efficiently uses multiple treatment therapies and techniques in the prevention and management of a variety of human disorders. Many medical schools have integrated CAM curriculum in medical education system worldwide. Research in knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) of diverse health professionals exposed to CAM courses is important from many perspectives including improvement in KAP and teaching skills of faculty, together with capacity building and curriculum development. OBJECTIVE AND

settingThis pre- and post-design cross-sectional study aimed to assess CAM-KAP of two intakes of medical students in Majmaah University, Saudi Arabia.

methodsThe second-year medical students of the first (year 2012-2013) and second (year 2013-2014) intake (n=26 and 39, respectively) were selected for this study. A reliable, 16-item self-administered questionnaire was distributed among all the students for answering before and after the 48-hour CAM course. The data were analyzed using appropriate statistical test of significance.

resultsMedical students' knowledge and attitude toward CAM significantly improved across some subitems of CAM questionnaire with a positive trend in the rest of its items including their views on CAM practices.

conclusionCAM course tends to have a positive impact on KAP of medical students. The preliminary results of this study call for further research with a larger sample in academic settings across the nation.

Indexed as

curriculummedical schoolsSaudi Arabiatraditional medical systemundergraduate medical students

Identifiers

PMID26082671
PMCPMC4461096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.