Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26082560›Full record

ArticleBMJ quality & safety2016

Patient and family engagement: a survey of US hospital practices.

Jeph Herrin, Kathleen G Harris, Kevin Kenward, Stephen Hines, Maulik S Joshi, Dominick L Frosch

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ quality & safety, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03609658 (Integrated Approach to Patient and Family Engagement for Advance Care Planning for Vulnerable Older Adult Within an Accountable Care Organization), which is not on this map. Cited by 47 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03609658 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Integrated Approach to Patient and Family Engagement for Advance Care Planning for Vulnerable Older Adult Within an Accountable Care Organization (ACO)

TypeinterventionalSponsorWake Forest University Health SciencesRan2018 to 2019Enrolled146ConditionsAdvance Care PlanningArmsNurse Navigator Pathway, Usual Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Strategies for involving patients and the public in scaling initiatives in health and social services: A scoping review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jeph HerrinHealth Research & Educational Trust, American Hospital Association, Chicago, Illinois, USA Division of Cardiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Kathleen G HarrisHealth Research & Educational Trust, American Hospital Association, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Kevin KenwardHealth Research & Educational Trust, American Hospital Association, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Stephen HinesHealth Research & Educational Trust, American Hospital Association, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Maulik S JoshiHealth Research & Educational Trust, American Hospital Association, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Dominick L FroschGordon & Betty Moore Foundation, Palo Alto, USA Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient and family engagement (PFE) in healthcare is an important element of the transforming healthcare system; however, the prevalence of various PFE practices in the USA is not known.

objectiveWe report on a survey of hospitals in the USA regarding their PFE practices during 2013-2014.

resultsThe response rate was 42%, with 1457 acute care hospitals completing the survey. We constructed 25 items to summarise the responses regarding key practices, which fell into three broad categories: (1) organisational practices, (2) bedside practices and (3) access to information and shared decision-making. We found a wide range of scores across hospitals. Selected findings include: 86% of hospitals had a policy for unrestricted visitor access in at least some units; 68% encouraged patients/families to participate in shift-change reports; 67% had formal policies for disclosing and apologising for errors; and 38% had a patient and family advisory council. The most commonly reported barrier to increased PFE was 'competing organisational priorities'. SUMMARY: Our findings indicate that there is a large variation in hospital implementation of PFE practices, with competing organisational priorities being the most commonly identified barrier to adoption.

Indexed as

Outcome Assessment, Health CareProfessional-Family RelationsClinical Decision-MakingCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery of Health CareFemaleHealth Care SurveysHospitalsHumansMalePatient-Centered CarePatient ParticipationUnited StatesHealthcare quality improvementLeadershipPatient-centred care

Identifiers

PMID26082560
PMCPMC4789699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.