Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26082499›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2015

Decoupling of divergent gene regulation by sequence-specific DNA binding factors.

Chao Yan, Daoyong Zhang, Juan Antonio Raygoza Garay, Michael M Mwangi, Lu Bai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Gene regulation of mammalian long non-coding RNA.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2018
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Timeless protection of telomeres.Current genetics · 2016
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chao YanDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA Center for Eukaryotic Gene Regulation, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Daoyong ZhangDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA Center for Eukaryotic Gene Regulation, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Juan Antonio Raygoza GarayDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA Center for Infectious Disease Dynamics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Michael M MwangiDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA Center for Infectious Disease Dynamics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Lu BaiDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA Center for Eukaryotic Gene Regulation, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA Department of Physics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA lub15@psu.edu.
Pennsylvania State University · USCenter for Disease Dynamics, Economics & Policy · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Divergent gene pairs (DGPs) are abundant in eukaryotic genomes. Since two genes in a DGP potentially share the same regulatory sequence, one might expect that they should be co-regulated. However, an inspection of yeast DGPs containing cell-cycle or stress response genes revealed that most DGPs are differentially-regulated. The mechanism underlying DGP differential regulation is not understood. Here, we showed that co- versus differential regulation cannot be explained by genetic features including promoter length, binding site orientation, TATA elements, nucleosome distribution, or presence of non-coding RNAs. Using time-lapse fluorescence microscopy, we carried out an in-depth study of a differentially regulated DGP, PFK26-MOB1. We found that their differential regulation is mainly achieved through two DNA-binding factors, Tbf1 and Mcm1. Similar to 'enhancer-blocking insulators' in higher eukaryotes, these factors shield the proximal promoter from the action of more distant transcription regulators. We confirmed the blockage function of Tbf1 using synthetic promoters. We further presented evidence that the blockage mechanism is widely used among genome-wide DGPs. Besides elucidating the DGP regulatory mechanism, our work revealed a novel class of insulators in yeast.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, FungalBinding SitesCell Cycle ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsGenome, FungalMinichromosome Maintenance 1 ProteinNucleosomesPhosphoproteinsPromoter Regions, GeneticRegulatory Elements, TranscriptionalRNA, UntranslatedSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTATA BoxTranscription FactorsCell Cycle ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsMCM1 protein, S cerevisiaeMinichromosome Maintenance 1 ProteinMOB1 protein, S cerevisiaeNucleosomesPhosphoproteinsRNA, UntranslatedSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTBF1 protein, S cerevisiaeTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID26082499
PMCPMC4551913
OpenAlexW1899070276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.