Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26082386›Full record

ArticleJournal of dental research2015

Spectrum of Dental Phenotypes in Nonsyndromic Orofacial Clefting.

B J Howe, M E Cooper, A R Vieira, S M Weinberg, J M Resick, N L Nidey, G L Wehby, M L Marazita, L M Moreno Uribe

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of dental research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Dental Anomalies' Characteristics.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The role of external aetiological factors in dental anomalies in non-syndromic cleft lip and palate patients.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

B J HoweDepartment of Family Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
M E CooperCenter for Craniofacial and Dental Genetics School of Dental Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
A R VieiraCenter for Craniofacial and Dental Genetics School of Dental Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA Department of Oral Biology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
S M WeinbergCenter for Craniofacial and Dental Genetics School of Dental Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
J M ResickCenter for Craniofacial and Dental Genetics School of Dental Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
N L NideyDepartment of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
G L WehbyDepartment of Health Management and Policy, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
M L MarazitaCenter for Craniofacial and Dental Genetics School of Dental Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA Department of Oral Biology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
L M Moreno UribeDepartment of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA Dows Institute for Dental Research, College of Dentistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA lina-moreno@uiowa.edu.
University of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000005 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REIS, STEVEN E · 2012 to 2015
$50.8M
Extending the Phenotype of Nonsyndromic Orofacial CleftsR01DE016148 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI MARAZITA, MARY L., WEINBERG, SETH M · 2004 to 2018
$19.7M
Molecular Genetic Epidemiology of Cleft Lip and PalateR37DE008559 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI MURRAY, JEFFREY C · 2004 to 2013
$6.8M
Cleft Lip Genetics: A Multi Center International ConsortiumR01DE014667 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI LIDRAL, ANDREW C · 2001 to 2009
$4.2M
Health outcomes and improved phenotypic characterization of cleft lip and palateR01DD000295 · DD · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI WEHBY, GEORGE L · 2007 to 2009
$1.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000005NCBDD CDC HHS R01 DD000295NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE014667NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE016148NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE106148NIDCR NIH HHS R37 DE008559NIDCR NIH HHS R37-DE-08559
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Children with oral clefts show a wide range of dental anomalies, adding complexity to understanding the phenotypic spectrum of orofacial clefting. The evidence is mixed, however, on whether the prevalence of dental anomalies is elevated in unaffected relatives and is mostly based on small samples. In the largest international cohort to date of children with nonsyndromic clefts, their relatives, and controls, this study characterizes the spectrum of cleft-related dental anomalies and evaluates whether families with clefting have a significantly higher risk for such anomalies compared with the general population. A total of 3,811 individuals were included: 660 cases with clefts, 1,922 unaffected relatives, and 1,229 controls. Dental anomalies were identified from in-person dental exams or intraoral photographs, and case-control differences were tested using χ(2) statistics. Cases had higher rates of dental anomalies in the maxillary arch than did controls for primary (21% vs. 4%, P = 3 × 10(-8)) and permanent dentitions (51% vs. 8%, P = 4 × 10(-62)) but not in the mandible. Dental anomalies were more prevalent in cleft lip with cleft palate than other cleft types. More anomalies were seen in the ipsilateral side of the cleft. Agenesis and tooth displacements were the most common dental anomalies found in case probands for primary and permanent dentitions. Compared with controls, unaffected siblings (10% vs. 2%, P = 0.003) and parents (13% vs. 7%, P = 0.001) showed a trend for increased anomalies of the maxillary permanent dentition. Yet, these differences were nonsignificant after multiple-testing correction, suggesting genetic heterogeneity in some families carrying susceptibility to both overt clefts and dental anomalies. Collectively, the findings suggest that most affected families do not have higher genetic risk for dental anomalies than the general population and that the higher prevalence of anomalies in cases is primarily a physical consequence of the cleft and surgical interventions.

Indexed as

Case-Control StudiesChildCleft LipCleft PalateCohort StudiesDental ArchFemaleGenetic HeterogeneityGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGlobal HealthHumansMaleMalocclusionMandibleMaxillaPhenotypegenetic susceptibilitymicrodontianonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palatesupernumerary teethtooth abnormalitiestooth agenesis

Identifiers

PMID26082386
PMCPMC4530345
OpenAlexW1630463803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.