Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26082168›Full record

ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2016

Microbial bioinformatics for food safety and production.

Wynand Alkema, Jos Boekhorst, Michiel Wels, Sacha A F T van Hijum

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Effect of Daily OralNutrients · 2021
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. A Machine Learning Model for Food Source Attribution ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  8. AntimicrobialAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. TheFrontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wynand Alkema
Jos Boekhorst
Michiel Wels
Sacha A F T van Hijum

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the production of fermented foods, microbes play an important role. Optimization of fermentation processes or starter culture production traditionally was a trial-and-error approach inspired by expert knowledge of the fermentation process. Current developments in high-throughput 'omics' technologies allow developing more rational approaches to improve fermentation processes both from the food functionality as well as from the food safety perspective. Here, the authors thematically review typical bioinformatics techniques and approaches to improve various aspects of the microbial production of fermented food products and food safety.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaComputational BiologyFermentationFood ContaminationFood MicrobiologyFood SafetyFood TechnologyGenetics, MicrobialHazard Analysis and Critical Control Pointsbioinformaticsfood, genomicsmicroorganismspredictive models

Identifiers

PMID26082168
PMCPMC4793891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.