Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26082160›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2015

Knockdown resistance (kdr) mutations in Indian Anopheles culicifacies populations.

Cherry L Dykes, Raja Babu S Kushwah, Manoj K Das, Shri N Sharma, Rajendra M Bhatt, Vijay Veer, Om P Agrawal, Tridibes Adak, Om P Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Bionomics ofJournal of arthropod-borne diseases · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Intensity of pyrethroid resistance inPathogens and global health · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Cherry L DykesNational Institute of Malaria Research, Sector 8, Dwarka, Delhi, India. cherry_dyke@yahoo.com.
Raja Babu S KushwahNational Institute of Malaria Research, Sector 8, Dwarka, Delhi, India. kushwah001@gmail.com.
Manoj K DasNational Institute of Malaria Research Field Unit TB Sanatorium complex, Itki, Ranchi, India. manojdas2003@yahoo.co.in.
Shri N SharmaNational Institute of Malaria Research Field Unit, RLTRI campus, Raipur, India. sn.sharma07@rediffmail.com.
Rajendra M BhattNational Institute of Malaria Research Field Unit, RLTRI campus, Raipur, India. rmbhatt@rediffmail.com.
Vijay VeerDefence Research Laboratory, Tezpur, Assam, India. vijayveer50@yahoo.com.
Om P AgrawalSchool of Studies in Zoology, Jiwaji University, Gwalior, India. op_agrawal51@rediffmail.com.
Tridibes AdakNational Institute of Malaria Research, Sector 8, Dwarka, Delhi, India. adak.mrc@gmail.com.
Om P SinghNational Institute of Malaria Research, Sector 8, Dwarka, Delhi, India. singh@mrcindia.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnopheles culicifacies s.l. is one of the primary vectors of malaria in India responsible for the highest number of malaria cases. This vector is resistant to DDT in most parts of the country with indication of emerging resistance to pyrethroids. Since knockdown resistance (kdr) is known to confer cross-resistance between DDT and pyrethroids owing to a common target site of action, knowledge of prevalence of knockdown resistance (kdr) alleles is important from insecticide resistance management point of view.

methodsNine populations of An. culicifacies belonging to five states of India, representing northern, western and central-east India, were screened for the presence of two alternative kdr mutations L1014F and L1014S using PCR-based assays. Dead and alive mosquitoes, following WHO standard insecticide susceptibility test against deltamethrin and DDT, were tested for allelic association.

resultsL1014F mutation was recorded in all populations studied except from Haryana and Rajasthan states in northern India, with low frequencies ranging between 0.012 and 0.076; whereas presence of L1014S mutation was recorded in five populations only belonging to central-east India, with allelic frequencies ranging between 0.010 and 0.046. Both the kdr mutant alleles were found mostly in heterozygous condition without deviating from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Both mutations showed protection against deltamethrin whereas only L1014S mutation showed protection against DDT when tested using additive model.

conclusionsThe two L1014-kdr mutations, L1014F and L1014S, co-occurred in five populations belonging to Chhattisgarh and Odisha states of India whereas L1014F was present in all populations studied except populations from northern states. Both kdr mutations were found with very low allelic frequencies mostly in heterozygous condition and exhibited protection against deltamethrin.

Indexed as

Insecticide ResistanceMutation, MissenseAllelesAnimalsAnophelesIndiaInsecticidesInsect ProteinsNitrilesPolymerase Chain ReactionPyrethrinsSodium ChannelsdecamethrinInsecticidesInsect ProteinsNitrilesPyrethrinsSodium Channels

Identifiers

PMID26082160
PMCPMC4480899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.