Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26082138›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2015

Surveillance of malaria vector population density and biting behaviour in western Kenya.

Ednah N Ototo, Jenard P Mbugi, Christine L Wanjala, Guofa Zhou, Andrew K Githeko, Guiyun Yan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ednah N OtotoCentre for Global Health Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), PO Box 1578, Kisumu, 40100, Kenya. ednaototo@gmail.com.
Jenard P MbugiKenyatta University, PO Box 43844, Nairobi, Kenya. mbugi_jp@yahoo.com.
Christine L WanjalaKenyatta University, PO Box 43844, Nairobi, Kenya. Cludwin3@gmail.com.
Guofa ZhouProgram in Public Health, University of California, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA. zhoug@uci.edu.
Andrew K GithekoCentre for Global Health Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), PO Box 1578, Kisumu, 40100, Kenya. githeko@yahoo.com.
Guiyun YanProgram in Public Health, University of California, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA. guiyuny@uci.edu.
Kenya Medical Research Institute · KEUniversity of California, Irvine · USKenyatta University · KEMasinde Muliro University of Science and Technology · KE

Funding

Ecology of African Highland MalariaR01AI050243 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI YAN, GUIYUN · 2001 to 2018
$8.8M
Research Training in Mosquito Genomics and Bioinformat*D43TW001505 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI Guiyun Yan · 2000 to 2026
$6.0M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW001505FIC NIH HHS D43 TW01505NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI050243
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMalaria is a great public health burden and Africa suffers the largest share of malaria-attributed deaths. Despite control efforts targeting indoor malaria transmission, such as insecticide-treated bed nets (ITNs) and deployment of indoor residual spraying, transmission of the parasite in western Kenya is still maintained. This study was carried out to determine the impact of ITNs on indoor vector densities and biting behaviour in western Kenya.

methodsIndoor collection of adult mosquitoes was done monthly in six study sites in western Kenya using pyrethrum spray collections from 2012 to 2014. The rotator trap collections were done in July-August in 2013 and May-June in 2014. Mosquitoes were collected every 2 h between 18.00 and 08.00 h. Human behaviour study was conducted via questionnaire surveys. Species within Anopheles gambiae complex was differentiated by PCR and sporozoite infectivity was determined by ELISA. Species distribution was determined and bed net coverage in the study sites was recorded.

resultsDuring the study a total of 5,469 mosquito vectors were collected from both PSC and Rotator traps comprising 3,181 (58.2%) Anopheles gambiae and 2,288 (41.8%) Anopheles funestus. Compared to all the study sites, Rae had the highest density of An. gambiae with a mean of 1.2 (P<0.001) while Kombewa had the highest density of An. funestus with a mean of 1.08 (P<0.001). Marani had the lowest density of vectors with 0.06 An. gambiae and 0.17 An. funestus (P<0.001). Among the 700 PCR confirmed An. gambiae s.l. individuals, An. gambiae s.s. accounted for 49% and An. arabiensis 51%. Over 50% of the study population stayed outdoors between 18.00 and 20.00 and 06.00 and 08.00 which was the time when highest densities of blood fed vectors were collected. Anopheles gambie s.s. was the main malaria parasite vector in the highland sites and An. arabiensis in the lowland sites. Bed net ownership in 2012 averaged 87% across the study sites.

conclusionsThis study suggests that mass distribution of ITNs has had a significant impact on vector densities, species distribution and sporozoite rate. However, shift of biting time poses significant threats to the current malaria vector control strategies which heavily rely on indoor controls.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorAnimalsAnophelesBites and StingsHumansInsecticidesInsecticide-Treated BednetsInsect VectorsKenyaMalariaMosquito ControlPopulation DensityInsecticides

Identifiers

PMID26082138
PMCPMC4468962
OpenAlexW1572155692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.