Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26081994›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

Improving access to endogenous DNA in ancient bones and teeth.

Peter B Damgaard, Ashot Margaryan, Hannes Schroeder, Ludovic Orlando, Eske Willerslev, Morten E Allentoft

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 127 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
127citing papers in PubMed
17.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

127 citing papers in PubMed, 273 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Demographic history of the Jomon people: insights from whole-mitogenome analysis.Anthropological science : journal of the Anthropological Society of Nippon = Jinruigaku zasshi · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

67 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Peter B DamgaardCentre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum, University of Copenhagen.
Ashot MargaryanCentre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum, University of Copenhagen.
Hannes Schroeder1] Centre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum, University of Copenhagen [2] Faculty of Archaeology, Leiden University, PO Box 9515, 2300 Leiden, The Netherlands.
Ludovic OrlandoCentre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum, University of Copenhagen.
Eske WillerslevCentre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum, University of Copenhagen.
Morten E AllentoftCentre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum, University of Copenhagen.
University of Copenhagen · DKNatural History Museum Aarhus · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Poor DNA preservation is the most limiting factor in ancient genomic research. In the majority of ancient bones and teeth, endogenous DNA molecules represent a minor fraction of the whole DNA extract, rendering shot-gun sequencing inefficient for obtaining genomic data. Based on ancient human bone samples from temperate and tropical environments, we show that an EDTA-based enzymatic 'pre-digestion' of powdered bone increases the proportion of endogenous DNA several fold. By performing the pre-digestion step between 30 min and 6 hours on five bones, we observe an asymptotic increase in endogenous DNA content, with a 2.7-fold average increase reached at 1 hour. We repeat the experiment using a brief pre-digestion (15 or 30 mins) on 21 ancient bones and teeth from a variety of archaeological contexts and observe an improvement in 16 of these. We here advocate the implementation of a brief pre-digestion step as a standard procedure in ancient DNA extractions. Finally, we demonstrate on 14 ancient teeth that by targeting the outer layer of the roots we obtain up to 14 times more endogenous DNA than when using the inner dentine. Our presented methods are likely to increase the proportion of ancient samples that are suitable for genome-scale characterization.

Indexed as

Bone and BonesDNA, MitochondrialToothArchaeologyFossilsHumansDNA, Mitochondrial

Identifiers

PMID26081994
PMCPMC4472031
OpenAlexW1483186590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.