ReviewPediatric radiology2015
A review of imaging protocols for suspected skeletal dysplasia and a proposal for standardisation.
Review in Pediatric radiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mucopolysaccharidosis or Skeletal Dysplasia? Clinical and Radiologic Clues for Differential Diagnosis Based on Difficult CasesJournal of clinical research in pediatric endocrinology · 2026Article
- The orthopaedic management of osteopetrosis in paediatric populations: a narrative review of the literature.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
- Recommendations for neuroradiological examinations in children living with achondroplasia: a European Society of Pediatric Radiology and European Society of Neuroradiology opinion paper.Pediatric radiology · 2023Review
- International Consensus Statement on the diagnosis, multidisciplinary management and lifelong care of individuals with achondroplasia.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2022Review
- Imaging of pediatric bone and growth disorders: Of diagnostic workhorses and new horizons.Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2021Article
- Skeletal Dysplasias: What Every Bone Health Clinician Needs to Know.Current osteoporosis reports · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Expert radiology opinions are often requested to aid diagnosis of skeletal dysplasias or dysostoses, but due to variability in the imaging protocols used at different centres the views presented may be considered inadequate or incomplete resulting in diagnostic delays and increased patient and family anxiety. We propose the introduction of a standardised protocol that may be adapted in certain specific situations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26081673What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.