Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26081603›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2015

Comparison of ITS and 18S rDNA for estimating fungal diversity using PCR-DGGE.

Jie Liu, Yaoyao Yu, Zhang Cai, Mark Bartlam, Yingying Wang

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Saline-alkali resilience: the role of Trametes NF1 in promoting alfalfa growth and salinity tolerance.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Gut Mycobiome and Asthma.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jie LiuMinistry of Education Key Laboratory of Pollution Processes and Environmental Criteria, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Environmental Remediation and Pollution Control, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin, 300071, China.
Yaoyao Yu
Zhang Cai
Mark Bartlam
Yingying Wang

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Both the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region and 18S rRNA genes are broadly applied in molecular fingerprinting studies of fungi. However, the differences in those two ribosomal RNA regions are still largely unknown. In the current study, three sets of most suitable subunit ribosomes in ITS and 18S rRNA were compared using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) under the optimum experimental conditions. Ten samples from both aquatic and soil environments were tested. The results revealed that the ITS region produced range-weighted richness in the range 36-361, which was significantly higher than that produced by 18S rDNA. There was a similar tendency in terms of the Shannon-Weaver diversity index and community dynamics in both water and soil samples. Samples from water and soil were better separated using ITS than 18S rDNA in principal component analysis of DGGE bands. Our study suggests that the ITS region is more precise and has more potential than 18S rRNA genes in fungal community analysis.

Indexed as

Denaturing Gradient Gel ElectrophoresisDNA, FungalDNA, IntergenicDNA, RibosomalFungiPhylogenyPolymerase Chain ReactionPrincipal Component AnalysisRNA, Ribosomal, 18SSequence Analysis, DNASoil MicrobiologyWater MicrobiologyDNA, FungalDNA, IntergenicDNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 18S

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.