Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26081593›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2016

Adherence to granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) guidelines to reduce the incidence of febrile neutropenia after chemotherapy--a representative sample survey in Germany.

Hartmut Link, J Nietsch, M Kerkmann, P Ortner, Supportive Care Group (ASORS) of the German Cancer Society (DKG)

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Leveraging G-CSF prescribing in the outpatient setting: considerations beyond clinical factors-a questionnaire study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  4. Cost-effectiveness of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs) for the prevention of febrile neutropenia (FN) in patients with cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  5. Outcomes in Patients With Curative Malignancies Receiving Filgrastim as Primary Prophylaxis.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2023
    Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Current state and future opportunities in granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF).Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Biosimilar Pegfilgrastim: Improving Access and Optimising Practice to Supportive Care that Enables Cure.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2020
    Review
  12. Guideline adherence in bone-targeted treatment of cancer patients with bone metastases in Germany.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
  13. G-CSF guideline adherence in Germany, an update with a retrospective and representative sample survey.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019
    Article
  14. Real-world use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in ambulatory breast cancer patients: a cross-sectional study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019
    Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Refining the role of pegfilgrastim (a long-acting G-CSF) for prevention of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia: consensus guidance recommendations.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2017
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Managing neutropenia by pegfilgrastim in patients affected by relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma treated with bendamustine-bortezomib-dexamethasone.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Hartmut LinkDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Hematology and Oncology, Westpfalz-Klinikum, 67655, Kaiserslautern, Germany. hlink@rhrk.uni-kl.de.
J NietschMMF GmbH, Heideblick 59, 44229, Dortmund, Germany.
M KerkmannMMF GmbH, Heideblick 59, 44229, Dortmund, Germany.
P Ortner, c/o POMMe-med GmbH, Von- Erckert- Str. 48, 81827, Munich, Germany.
Supportive Care Group (ASORS) of the German Cancer Society (DKG)
Pomeranian Medical University · PLWestpfalz Klinikum · DEMarine Megafauna Foundation · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFebrile neutropenia (FN) after chemotherapy increases complications, morbidity, risk of death, reduction of dose delivery and impairs quality of life. Primary granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) prophylaxis after chemotherapy is recommended in the guideline (GL) if the risk of FN is high (≥20%) or intermediate (≥10-20%) with additional risk factors. This study evaluated the implementation of G-CSF GL. PATIENTS AND

methodsSample size of the survey was calculated at 2% of the incidences of malignant lymphoma, breast cancer, and lung cancer in Germany in 2006. Patients were documented retrospectively over three to nine cycles of chemotherapy and FN risk ≥10%. Professional physician profiles were analyzed by classification and regression tree analysis (CART).

resultsOne hundred ninety-five hematologists-oncologists and pulmonologists and gynecologists specialized in oncology documented data of 666 lung cancer patients, 286 malignant lymphoma patients, and 976 breast cancer patients, with 7805 chemotherapy cycles; 85.1% of physicians claimed adhering to G-CSF GL. Adherence to GL in all high-FN-risk chemotherapy cycles was 15.4% in lung cancer, 84.5% in malignant lymphoma, and 85.6% in breast cancer, and in all intermediate-FN-risk chemotherapy cycles, lung cancer it was 38.8%, malignant lymphoma it was 59.4%, and breast cancer it was 49.3%. G-CSF was overused without additional patient risk factors in 7.2% lung cancer cycles, 16.8% malignant lymphoma cycles, and 17.6% breast cancer cycles. The CART analysis split pulmonologists and other specialists, with the latter adhering more to GL. Pulmonologists, trained less than 22.5 years, adhered better to GL, as did also gynecologists or hematologists-oncologists with professional experience less than 8.1 years.

conclusionsAcceptance of and adherence to G-CSF GL differed between lung cancer, lymphoma, and breast cancer. Physicians overestimate their adherence to the GL. Physicians adhering to the GL can be characterized.

Indexed as

Guideline AdherencePractice Guidelines as TopicAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsBreast NeoplasmsChemotherapy-Induced Febrile NeutropeniaClinical CompetenceFemaleGermanyGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorHumansIncidenceLung NeoplasmsLymphomaMaleAntineoplastic AgentsGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorAdherenceFebrile neutropeniaG-CSF guidelinesImplementationPhysicians’ professional profile

Identifiers

PMID26081593
OpenAlexW617725816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.