Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26081286›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2015

The differences of clinicopathological factors for breast cancer in respect to time of recurrence and effect on recurrence-free survival.

B B Oven Ustaalioglu, O Balvan, A Bilici, A Develi, M Aliustaoglu, F A Vardar, B Erkol

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Late recurrence (more than 10 years) in early (tumors equal to or smaller than 2 cm) breast cancer patients.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2016
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

B B Oven UstaaliogluDepartment of Medical Oncology, HaydarpasaNumuneEducation and Research Hospital, Selimiye Mah, Şair Nesimi sok, Kardeşler Apt., No: 1, Daire: 4, Uskudar, 34668, Istanbul, Turkey. basakoven@yahoo.com.
O BalvanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dr. LutfiKirdarKartal Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
A BiliciDepartment of Medical Oncology, Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.
A DeveliDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dr. LutfiKirdarKartal Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
M AliustaogluDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dr. LutfiKirdarKartal Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
F A VardarDepartment of Pathology, Haydarpasa Numune Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
B ErkolDepartment of Medical Oncology, HaydarpasaNumuneEducation and Research Hospital, Selimiye Mah, Şair Nesimi sok, Kardeşler Apt., No: 1, Daire: 4, Uskudar, 34668, Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn the literature, small number of study has addressed time of recurrence in breast cancer. We analyzed clinicopathological factors predicting early or late recurrence in breast cancer patients and also prognostic factors related with recurrence-free survival (RFS) in recurrent patients. PATIENTS/

methodsWe evaluated retrospectively 1980 breast cancer patients. Relapsed was defined as early if it was occured first 5 year of follow-up (Group 1) and late if it was occured after 5 years (Group 2). The clinicopathological factors were compared in respect of time of recurrence. The prognostic factors were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses.

resultsRecurrence wase detected in 141 patient during follow-up. Tumors recurred after 5 years more likely to have lower stage (p = 0.05), tumors without lymphovascular invasion (LVI) (p < 0.001) and perineural invasion (PNI) (p = 0.01), and also HER2 negative (p < 0.001). The median RFS time and 5 years RFS rates were 42.9 months and 31.9 %, respectively. LVI (p = 0.01), PNI (p = 0.03), HER2 (p = 0.003), progesterone receptor (PR) (p = 0.04), the presence of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.003), adjuvant hormonotherapy (p = 0.05) were found to be related with RFS. Axillary lymph node metastasis (p = 0.05) and the presence of PNI (p = 0.009) were poor prognostic factors for early recurrent group. PR-positive tumors (p = 0.001) and luminal subtypes (p = 0.03) had instances of late recurrences significantly.

conclusionsClinicopathological factors predicting the recurrence time in breast cancer were important to modify adjuvant therapy.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneRetrospective StudiesERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneBreast cancerLate recurrenceRecurrenceRecurrence-free survival

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.