Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26081256›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2015

N-of-1 randomized trials for psychological and health behavior outcomes: a systematic review protocol.

Jonathan A Shaffer, Louis Falzon, Ken Cheung, Karina W Davidson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. In Reply.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2017
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan A ShafferDepartment of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, 622 West 168th Street, PH9 West, Room 318, New York, NY, 10032, USA. js3742@cumc.columbia.edu.
Louis FalzonDepartment of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, 622 West 168th Street, PH9 West, Room 318, New York, NY, 10032, USA. af2215@cumc.columbia.edu.
Ken CheungDepartment of Biostatistics, Columbia Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA. cheung@biostat.columbia.edu.
Karina W DavidsonDepartment of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, 622 West 168th Street, PH9 West, Room 318, New York, NY, 10032, USA. kwd2124@cumc.columbia.edu.
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · USColumbia University · US

Funding

WORKSITE BLOOD PRESSURE STUDYP01HL047540 · NHLBI · WEILL MEDICAL COLLEGE OF CORNELL UNIV · PI BURG, MATTHEW M · 1993 to 2014
$27.7M
Depression, Biobehavioral Mechanisms, & CHD/Mortality OutcomesP01HL088117 · NHLBI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI DAVIDSON, KARINA W. · 2008 to 2013
$12.5M
Developing Optimal Dynamic Behavioral Intervention in Community-Based Studies.R01NS072127 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI CHEUNG, KEN · 2011 to 2013
$835k
Improving QoL in Outpatients with Heart Failure: A Dose-Finding Study and RCTK23HL112850 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SHAFFER, JONATHAN A · 2013 to 2017
$631k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL112850NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL047540NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL088117NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS072127PHS HHS K24 084034
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRandomized controlled trials are the sine qua non of causal inference; however, heterogeneity of treatment effects for many chronic conditions and for many symptoms often limits their utility. Single-patient studies in which patients select a treatment after trying a randomized sequence of treatments (i.e., multiple crossover trials) offer an alternative to traditional randomized controlled trials by providing scientifically valid results in a practical manner that can be used by patients and their providers to decide upon their personally optimal treatment. Although N-of-1 trials have been used in the medical literature, their use for interventions that consist of psychological or health behavior outcomes is unknown. This systematic review thus aims to describe the interventions and outcomes and assess the quality of N-of-1 trials for psychological or health behavior outcomes. METHODS/

designElectronic databases (Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and the six databases in the Cochrane Library) will be searched using all relevant subject headings and free-text terms to represent N-of-1 trials and psychological or behavioral interventions. Full text review and bibliography searching will be conducted. Unpublished studies will be sought by searching trial registries and contacting authors of included studies. Eligibility criteria are the following: population, all human participants for whom N-of-1 trials with psychological or health behavior outcomes have been conducted; interventions, all interventions for which N-of-1 trials have been conducted; comparison, placebo or active treatment control; and outcome, psychological and health behavior outcomes including self-perceived disease severity and psychological phenomena such as mood and affect. Studies that do not contain sufficient trial detail, describe only design or statistical analytic issues in N-of-1 trials without presentation of an N-of-1 trial itself, and/or are not written in the English language are ineligible. Screening, data extraction, and quality assessment will be conducted by two independent reviewers with disagreements resolved through discussion. DISCUSSION: This systematic review will describe the interventions and outcomes and assess the quality of N-of-1 trials for psychological or health behavior outcomes. The results will clarify the use of this research methodology in the health psychology and behavioral medicine literature and may pave the way for additional N-of-1 trials to be conducted. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42015017853.

Indexed as

Clinical ProtocolsHealth BehaviorRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicBehavior TherapyChronic DiseaseHumansMental DisordersSystematic Reviews as Topic

Identifiers

PMID26081256
PMCPMC4471921
OpenAlexW2168265065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.