Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26081224›Full record

Trial reportMolecular nutrition & food research2015

Incorporation of eicosapentaenioic and docosahexaenoic acids into breast adipose tissue of women at high risk of breast cancer: a randomized clinical trial of dietary fish and n-3 fatty acid capsules.

Shana Straka, Joanne L Lester, Rachel M Cole, Rebecca R Andridge, Sarah Puchala, Angela M Rose, Steven K Clinton, Martha A Belury, Lisa D Yee

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Molecular nutrition & food research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shana StrakaDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Joanne L LesterCollege of Nursing, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Rachel M ColeHuman Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Rebecca R AndridgeDivision of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Sarah PuchalaHuman Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Angela M RoseHuman Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Steven K ClintonDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Martha A BeluryHuman Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Lisa D YeeDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
The Ohio State University · US

Funding

Translational Therapeutics Research Program (TT)P30CA016058 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Jennifer A. Woyach · 1985 to 2026
$132.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016058
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

scopeThe fatty acid profile of dietary lipids is reflected in mammary adipose tissue and may influence mammary gland biology and cancer risk. To determine the effects of fish consumption on breast adipose tissue fatty acids, we conducted a study of fish versus n-3 PUFA supplements in women at increased risk of breast cancer. METHODS AND

resultsHigh risk women were randomized to comparable doses of marine n-3 PUFAs as canned salmon + albacore or capsules for 3 months. Pre- and posttreatment fatty acid profiles were obtained by GC. Dietary fish (n = 12) and n-3 PUFA capsules (n = 13) yielded increased eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) in plasma (p < 0.0001), erythrocyte membranes (p < 0.0001), and breast fat (p < 0.01) at 3 months. Women taking capsules had higher plasma and erythrocyte membrane EPA changes (∼four versus twofold, p = 0.002), without significant differences in DHA. Increases in breast adipose EPA, DHA were similar for both groups. Higher BMI correlated with smaller changes in plasma, erythrocyte membrane EPA, and breast adipose EPA, DHA. Adherence was excellent at 93.9% overall and higher in the fish arm (p = 0.01).

conclusionFish provides an excellent source of n-3 PUFAs that increases breast adipose EPA, DHA similar to supplements and represents a well-tolerated intervention for future studies of the impact of n-3 PUFAs and dietary patterns on breast cancer.

Indexed as

Adipose TissueAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnimalsAntigens, CDAntigens, Differentiation, MyelomonocyticBody Mass IndexBreastBreast NeoplasmsCapsulesCD68 MoleculeCyclooxygenase 2Dietary FatsDietary SupplementsDocosahexaenoic AcidsAntigens, CDAntigens, Differentiation, MyelomonocyticCapsulesCD68 antigen, humanCD68 MoleculeCyclooxygenase 2Dietary FatsDocosahexaenoic AcidsEicosapentaenoic AcidInterleukin-6PTGS2 protein, humanBreast adipose tissueDHADietary fishEPAn-3 PUFAs

Identifiers

PMID26081224
PMCPMC7233800
OpenAlexW2132648931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.