Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26080838›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2015

miR-195 Inhibits Tumor Progression by Targeting RPS6KB1 in Human Prostate Cancer.

Chao Cai, Qing-Biao Chen, Zhao-Dong Han, Yan-Qiong Zhang, Hui-Chan He, Jia-Hong Chen, Yan-Ru Chen, Sheng-Bang Yang, Yong-Ding Wu, Yan-Ru Zeng and 8 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 152 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Chao CaiDepartment of Urology, Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology, Guangzhou, China.
Qing-Biao ChenGuangdong Provincial Institute of Nephrology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhao-Dong HanDepartment of Urology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Clinical Molecular Medicine and Diagnostics, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yan-Qiong ZhangInstitute of Chinese Materia Medica, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Hui-Chan HeDepartment of Urology, Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology, Guangzhou, China. Department of Urology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Clinical Molecular Medicine and Diagnostics, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jia-Hong ChenDepartment of Urology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Clinical Molecular Medicine and Diagnostics, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yan-Ru ChenDepartment of Urology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Clinical Molecular Medicine and Diagnostics, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Sheng-Bang YangDepartment of Urology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Clinical Molecular Medicine and Diagnostics, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yong-Ding WuDepartment of Urology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Clinical Molecular Medicine and Diagnostics, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yan-Ru ZengGuangdong Provincial Institute of Nephrology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China. Department of Urology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Clinical Molecular Medicine and Diagnostics, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Guo-Qiang QinCentral Hospital of Panyu District, Guangzhou, China.
Yu-Xiang LiangDepartment of Urology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Clinical Molecular Medicine and Diagnostics, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Qi-Shan DaiDepartment of Urology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Clinical Molecular Medicine and Diagnostics, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Fu-Neng JiangDepartment of Urology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Clinical Molecular Medicine and Diagnostics, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Shu-lin WuDepartment of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Guo-Hua ZengDepartment of Urology, Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology, Guangzhou, China.
Wei-De ZhongDepartment of Urology, Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology, Guangzhou, China. Guangdong Provincial Institute of Nephrology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China. Department of Urology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Clinical Molecular Medicine and Diagnostics, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China. zhongwd2009@live.cn cwu2@partners.org.
Chin-Lee WuDepartment of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. Department of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. zhongwd2009@live.cn cwu2@partners.org.
First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University · CNMassachusetts General Hospital · USChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNPanyu Hospital of Chinese Medicine · CNSouthern Medical University · CN

Funding

Tuberous Sclerosis-Pathway and PathogenesisP01CA120964 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI David J. Kwiatkowski · 2007 to 2026
$35.9M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA120964
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the involvement of hsa-miRNA-195-5p (miR-195) in progression and prognosis of human prostate cancer. EXPERIMENTAL

designqRT-PCR was performed to detect miR-195 expression in both prostate cancer cell lines and clinical tissue samples. Its clinical significance was statistically analyzed. The roles of miR-195 and its candidate target gene, ribosomal protein S6 kinase, 70 kDa, polypeptide 1 (RPS6KB1) in prostate cancer progression were confirmed on the basis of both in vitro and in vivo systems.

resultsmiR-195 downregulation in prostate cancer tissues was significantly associated with high Gleason score (P = 0.001), positive metastasis failure (P < 0.001), and biochemical recurrence (BCR, P < 0.001). Survival analysis identified miR-195 as an independent prognostic factor for BCR-free survival of prostate cancer patients (P = 0.022). Then, we confirmed the tumor suppressive role of miR-195 through prostate cancer cell invasion, migration, and apoptosis assays in vitro, along with tumor xenograft growth, angiogenesis, and invasion in vivo according to both gain-of-function and loss-of-function experiments. In addition, RPS6KB1 was identified as a novel direct target of miR-195 through proteomic expression profiling combined with bioinformatic target prediction and luciferase reporter assay. Moreover, the reexpression and knockdown of RPS6KB1 could respectively rescue and imitate the effects induced by miR-195. Importantly, RPS6KB1 expression was closely correlated with aggressive progression and poor prognosis in prostate cancer patients as opposed to miR-195. Furthermore, we identified MMP-9, VEGF, BAD, and E-cadherin as the downstream effectors of miR-195-RPS6KB1 axis.

conclusionThe newly identified miR-195-RPS6KB1 axis partially illustrates the molecular mechanism of prostate cancer progression and represents a novel potential therapeutic target for prostate cancer treatment.

Indexed as

RNA Interference3' Untranslated RegionsAnimalsApoptosisBase Sequencebcl-Associated Death ProteinBinding SitesCadherinsCell Line, TumorCell MovementDisease Models, AnimalDisease ProgressionGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMaleMatrix Metalloproteinase 93' Untranslated Regionsbcl-Associated Death ProteinCadherinsMatrix Metalloproteinase 9MicroRNAsMIRN195 microRNA, humanribosomal protein S6 kinase, 70kD, polypeptide 1Ribosomal Protein S6 Kinases, 70-kDaRNA, MessengerVascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

Identifiers

PMID26080838
PMCPMC4631653
OpenAlexW1929233057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.